Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:12 pm  

Wright is wrong.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:53 pm  

I blame Richard Agar.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:04 pm  

There's something in me that can't help but admire the balls of the man to produce such a disingenuous document with such obvious temerity. But that something in me is swallowed up by the overwhelming part of me which thinks he's probably the biggest bell end in the five towns area

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:05 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

I blame Richard Agar.

Bingo!!!

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:11 pm  

Vile little man. Trying to wreck our chances. We rejected a groundshare yonks ago the loony! And plus, I haven't seen any signs of where we would be playing if that ever happened anyway... 'GH mudpile'

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:26 pm  

Slugger McBatt wrote:

Or to paraphrase:
"You don't need to let Trinity have Newmarket because they can play at our place, preparation for which is going really well. Look, here's a picture of me on a digger. In fact, you've only got to have this inquiry because of the unreasonableness of Trinity. So put away your briefcase now and go home. Nothing to see."

Like any procedure where two sides are heard, you are going to hear things you don't agree with. If RW's offer to play out of Glasshoughton swings it, then we don't stand a chance. Just treat it with the contempt it deserves.

Now, when Tesco start their planning for Wheldon Road, it will be perfectly alright for Mr Glover to write a letter on headed paper saying, "we've got loads of supermarkets and Cas can play out of Newmarket." Or maybe he won't, because it would just be wrong and irrelevant.

Any RUGBY LEAGUE fan would question the motives of a man who writes a letter to a group AGAINST another club's stadium plans when he has absolutly no need to to do so!!!

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:10 pm  

Well i have just read his response. He has not slagged us of at all nor has he objected to NM.

He confrimed that they would take part in a council led feasability study and we wouldn't. He also says that Wakey can play at J32 if needed.

All we are doing is creating more publicity that we were not confident enough to up against Glasshoughton.

This may not be popular to some, but what he has sais has been said before. We have said we would welcome the Tigers to play at NM. And we did refuse to take part in the feasability study.

We should spend our time supporting our plans, in stead of going over the top like some have on here.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:11 pm  

The inspector is going to look at Belle Vue, the HJ and LSV is he not. Why not ask him to pop along to visit the fabulous facilities on offer to us that Richard Wright mentions at Glasshoughton as well then.

No? Oh of course theres nothing there is there.

Ok, well just show him all the written agreements showing the funding is all in place, guarenteeing it will be built before the start of the next franchise period.

No? What, you mean there aren't any of those either.....

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:15 pm  

youngcat wrote:

Well i have just read his response. He has not slagged us of at all nor has he objected to NM.

He confrimed that they would take part in a council led feasability study and we wouldn't. He also says that Wakey can play at J32 if needed.

All we are doing is creating more publicity that we were not confident enough to up against Glasshoughton.

This may not be popular to some, but what he has sais has been said before. We have said we would welcome the Tigers to play at NM. And we did refuse to take part in the feasability study.

We should spend our time supporting our plans, in stead of going over the top like some have on here.

But the first thing you should ask yourself is WHY SAY ANYTHING AT ALL?? why? what is the agenda of a man who could have said nothing but CHOSE to comment to a group who were against our new ground? with 'friends' like that...

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:20 pm  

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/dec/06/wakefield-castleford-stadium?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/dec/06/wakefield-castleford-stadium?