FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Universal benefits vs Means-testing
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels26578
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 08 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Jul 17 23:1930th Apr 17 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the set of NEDS...
Signature
Image


ebay's Rugby League Bargains ¦ Boost Your eBay Sales ¦ Recommended Amazon Stuff ¦ Get a Free Ink Cart!!! ¦ Quins RL T-Shirts, BRAND NEW DESIGNS

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:49 pm  
cod'ead wrote:
There's also the fact that the deficit was lower in 2007 (prior to the bank bailouts) than it was when Labour took over in 1997


And they also finished paying back our war debts from WWII which governments of every hue failed to do in the 60's. 70's and 80's.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200223 years319th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:14 pm  
JerryChicken wrote:
Although that wasn't the case with at least two out of three of those example dates.


Which two were they - Cameron inherited a mess from Brown and Thatcher inherited a mess from Callaghan!!

It also smacks a bit of Keynes' 10 year economic cycle?
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:20 pm  
Politicians of both major parties have done nothing but mess things up (and not just the economy) during my lifetime. They are inept.

On a wider point, I don't hold out much hope for the UK's medium term future for many reasons.

1. Extremely indebted.
2. Ageing population.
3. Becoming a low-wage economy, causing lack of demand.
4. No sign of being able to develop new, strong export creating business.
5. Property prices too high to enable efficient movement of labour or to permit businesses to flourish (look what's happening in retail with their city centre shop rents).
6. The fact that the country is wedded to high property prices in order to support our overly large financial sector and so a downward correction in prices is the last thing any policy maker wants.
7. The fact that interest rates will rise and some point and almost certainly before the economy picks up. If and when that happens, unless any rise is modest there will be mayhem - huge number of business failures, job losses and people unable to afford their homes. All of which will hammer the banking system, which has not been shrunk back sufficiently.

As I said when the financial crisis kicked off and Gordon Brown said we were better placed than most of our competitors, no, we are actually desperately poorly placed. In fact, I would say worse than Greece, Italy or Spain. At some point reality will bite unless the policy-makers can pull a rabbit out of the hat.
RankPostsTeam
International Star337No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 13 201114 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Oct 16 22:053rd Oct 16 22:04LINK
Milestone Posts
250
500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
West of the City of Culture 2017

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:36 pm  
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:37 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
Which two were they - Cameron inherited a mess from Brown and Thatcher inherited a mess from Callaghan!!


Almost as predictable as Liverpool fans singing "You'll never walk alone" or West Ham singing "Bubbles".
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200223 years319th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:09 pm  
JerryChicken wrote:
Almost as predictable as Liverpool fans singing "You'll never walk alone" or West Ham singing "Bubbles".


Just answer the question - it wasn't difficult, especially to someone with such self belief in your own opinion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach16271
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 12 200420 years73rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Nov 24 21:1723rd Nov 24 19:55LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Signature
Challenge Cup winners 2009 2010 2012 2019
League Leaders 2011 2016

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:26 pm  
TrinityIHC wrote:
To be fair it's not like the tories come into office and instantly plunge the country into recession,


Exactly - they aren't coming in to office inheriting recessions. It's after they've had chance to bring in their first budget, that the recession happens.

The Conservative party works hard to push the line that they always come in having to clean up the mess after an inept Labour government, so that they have a line 'its Labour's fault' to cover themselves. The facts are quite different:

The time when a government came into office having to clean up a mess, was the start of Harold Wilson's second term, in 1974.

There was a recession at the end of Ted Heath's Conservative government in 1973-74. This is when there were energy shortages and the government had to go to a three day week to conserve energy. The miners were on strike and the country was in disarray. The Tories got voted out. Harold Wilson inherited a country in recession with double digit inflation. Two years later, we had to go to the IMF for bail out money. Of course the Tories always use this as a claim that "in the 1970s, Labour ruined the country and sent us into the arms of the IMF", they don't tell you that what they left Labour 2 years earlier was a recession, double digit inflation and having to be on three day weeks because of energy shortages!

Wilson resigned in 1976 and handed over to Callaghan who had a three year term like Gordon Brown later did. This was a turbulent time with union strikes following the IMF bail out but in the final year of Callaghan's term the economy grew 5.4%. It was not an economy in recession - far from it. That is well above the UK normal growth rate of about 2.5%.

I expect the next guess will be "put I bet Callaghan left a big budget deficit". The budget deficit the Tories left in 1974 was 5.5% of GDP, the budget deficit Labour left in 1979 was 4.7% of GDP, so the deficit had fallen slightly.

The recession didn't come till a year later, from 1980-81, after Thatcher had taken the reins. She also left a country in recession when she left office in 1990, as John Major took over at a point the 1990-91 recession had already started.

In more recent times, the financial crash was 2008. The recession under Labour was 2008-09, but the economy was recovering after that - a point which is often forgotten. It's only since the Coalition has been in office that we have had the story of 'stagnation' and 'flat growth' or 'double dip recession'. The last year Labour were in office, which was the year after the recession, the economy grew at 2.1%. This is approaching the UK's normal growth rate.

We went back into recession from 2011-12 under the Coalition.

The irony is, now, the Conservative line is 'of course we are back in recession because we had to cut back on public spending to deal with the deficit'. But at the time of the election, they argued that Keynes was a myth, and that cutting public spending wouldn't damage growth. They said that cutting public spending would free up resources to the private sector and allow the private sector to grow. But the private sector isn't growing.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:56 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
Just answer the question - it wasn't difficult, especially to someone with such self belief in your own opinion.



Your statement was just a line from your club anthem - sooner or later the current government has to stop blaming the one who went before and start giving us some evidence that their plan was better.

Can you imagine a business being run on the same terms as GB PLC ?

A business where half of the board of directors diametrically oppose the other half and will vote every single plan down, even if they agree with it, just because its the other half that suggested it - and then every four or five years they all re-arrange the seats and the fighting starts all over again (even granted that you yourself worked in such a business in the past :wink: )

Can you imagine such a business surviving in a commercial world ?

Sooner or later this current government has to wake up to the fact that in 2010 they told the electorate that they had a plan and that they knew what to do with the economy because in two or three years time they are going to have to come around knocking on the doors and asking "How do you think we've done then ?" and when they do, blaming something that happened seven years ago (as it will be) isn't going to help them one little bit - its time to stand up and tell it like it is right now instead of blaming someone else all the time, if they thought the job was impossible then they shouldn't have stood up for it in the first place.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200223 years319th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:28 pm  
sally cinnamon wrote:
Exactly - they aren't coming in to office inheriting recessions. It's after they've had chance to bring in their first budget, that the recession happens.

The Conservative party works hard to push the line that they always come in having to clean up the mess after an inept Labour government, so that they have a line 'its Labour's fault' to cover themselves. The facts are quite different:

The time when a government came into office having to clean up a mess, was the start of Harold Wilson's second term, in 1974.

There was a recession at the end of Ted Heath's Conservative government in 1973-74. This is when there were energy shortages and the government had to go to a three day week to conserve energy. The miners were on strike and the country was in disarray. The Tories got voted out. Harold Wilson inherited a country in recession with double digit inflation. Two years later, we had to go to the IMF for bail out money. Of course the Tories always use this as a claim that "in the 1970s, Labour ruined the country and sent us into the arms of the IMF", they don't tell you that what they left Labour 2 years earlier was a recession, double digit inflation and having to be on three day weeks because of energy shortages!

Wilson resigned in 1976 and handed over to Callaghan who had a three year term like Gordon Brown later did. This was a turbulent time with union strikes following the IMF bail out but in the final year of Callaghan's term the economy grew 5.4%. It was not an economy in recession - far from it. That is well above the UK normal growth rate of about 2.5%.

I expect the next guess will be "put I bet Callaghan left a big budget deficit". The budget deficit the Tories left in 1974 was 5.5% of GDP, the budget deficit Labour left in 1979 was 4.7% of GDP, so the deficit had fallen slightly.

The recession didn't come till a year later, from 1980-81, after Thatcher had taken the reins. She also left a country in recession when she left office in 1990, as John Major took over at a point the 1990-91 recession had already started.

In more recent times, the financial crash was 2008. The recession under Labour was 2008-09, but the economy was recovering after that - a point which is often forgotten. It's only since the Coalition has been in office that we have had the story of 'stagnation' and 'flat growth' or 'double dip recession'. The last year Labour were in office, which was the year after the recession, the economy grew at 2.1%. This is approaching the UK's normal growth rate.

We went back into recession from 2011-12 under the Coalition.

The irony is, now, the Conservative line is 'of course we are back in recession because we had to cut back on public spending to deal with the deficit'. But at the time of the election, they argued that Keynes was a myth, and that cutting public spending wouldn't damage growth. They said that cutting public spending would free up resources to the private sector and allow the private sector to grow. But the private sector isn't growing.


An example of how statistics can be used to give a view that doesn't present the whole picture.

To begin with as a Tory voter I think the coalition are a total disgrace and completely out of their depth. I have always Tory but I will not vote Tory at the next election.

To just take the data and suggest that is the definitive answer is far too simplistic. The mix of private to public sector is different, the role of unions is very different, the idea the Labour was going into a period of sustained growth in 2009 is simply not believable
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:24 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:

To just take the data and suggest that is the definitive answer is far too simplistic. The mix of private to public sector is different, the role of unions is very different, the idea the Labour was going into a period of sustained growth in 2009 is simply not believable


In very simplistic terms though do you think that had the "austerity cuts" of 2010 not been as deep, and had not promised much deeper cuts in future years, that the ground made in 2009 could at least have been maintained rather than slipping backwards ?
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 224 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
3m
Refs referring it to video as a try or not
Smiffy27
53
4m
Film game
karetaker
6012
5m
IMG scores
Khlav Kalash
270
28m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40864
29m
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
63330
40m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Cokey
3
51m
Accounts
Bullseye
146
54m
All time academy produced Super league era side
rollin thund
1
Recent
Out of contract 2025
Abe Froman
69
Recent
Shirt reveal coming soon
18th Man
60
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
23s
Transfer Talk V5
ArthurClues
561
27s
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
35s
Salford placed in special measures
supercat
126
47s
Rumours and signings v9
Big Steve
28923
50s
2025 Kits
Dave K.
32
1m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
1m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Wigg'n
6
1m
Film game
karetaker
6012
2m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40864
2m
Out of contract 2025
Abe Froman
69
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
rollin thund
1
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
Wigg'n
3
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Cokey
3
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Wigg'n
6
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
3m
Refs referring it to video as a try or not
Smiffy27
53
4m
Film game
karetaker
6012
5m
IMG scores
Khlav Kalash
270
28m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40864
29m
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
63330
40m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Cokey
3
51m
Accounts
Bullseye
146
54m
All time academy produced Super league era side
rollin thund
1
Recent
Out of contract 2025
Abe Froman
69
Recent
Shirt reveal coming soon
18th Man
60
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
23s
Transfer Talk V5
ArthurClues
561
27s
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
35s
Salford placed in special measures
supercat
126
47s
Rumours and signings v9
Big Steve
28923
50s
2025 Kits
Dave K.
32
1m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
1m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Wigg'n
6
1m
Film game
karetaker
6012
2m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40864
2m
Out of contract 2025
Abe Froman
69
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
rollin thund
1
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
Wigg'n
3
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Cokey
3
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Wigg'n
6
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!