FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Universal benefits vs Means-testing
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels14522No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 26 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
30th Jan 14 14:039th Jan 14 11:22LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Online
Signature
Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice.
Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.

Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:50 pm  
I have been struck quite forcibly by how many people don't understand why universal benefits have existed or why they are not means-tested.

Back in the day, if you needed a helping-hand, you had to go cap-in-hand and ask "the Parish" for a hand-out and would most likely receive a lecture, delivered by some no-nothing daughter of a well-to-do local captain of industry, on your profligacy and fecklessness instead.
Families would routinely be split-up and have to go live in a workhouse to avoid starvation.

Fast-forward to the 1940's and universal benefits come into the picture.
You don't apply for them, everyone gets them and no-one has to be demeaningly means-tested to get it.
Instead, everyone pays into the system according to thier mean (we used to call this income tax).
Whilst it may seem counter-intuitive to give someone something and then take it back in tax, it's actually a cheaper method than putting some arcane process in place and a lot more civilised than making the recipients jump through multiple hoops to get it.

So, I now open this topic for debate.
n.b. It's not about the level of benefits but about the relative merits of universal versus means-tested.
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:05 pm  
Not only that, but better off people in receipt of non-means tested benefits pay some back in tax. This idea of cutting back on payments to "rich" pensioners is bonkers. The cost of administering the system will outweigh the benefits, not least because the really well off pensioners will be paying 40% or 50% tax on them anyhow. I suspect its all more about disadvantaging the better off in the hope they will rebel against the welfare system and so the government can let it all crumble to everyones detriment except the ultra-wealthy.
John_D 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman31779
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 21 200223 years291st
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Jul 24 07:1515th Jul 24 07:10LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
The commentary box
Signature
johnpdobson.com


Twitter
Moderator

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:28 pm  
Dally wrote:
I suspect its all more about disadvantaging the better off

Whatever it is, it ain't that, even given the caveat you added
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member28186No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 03 200322 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Aug 16 11:3717th Aug 16 11:37LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
A world of my own ...
Signature
"As you travel through life don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things" - George Carlin

//twitter.com/AndyGilder

//fromthewesternterrace.blogspot.co.uk

This week: Four keys to a Rhinos win in the WCC

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:33 pm  
Means-testing supposedly targets the help at those who need it most, although given the Child Benefit Charge rules I suspect the current government don't actually understad what that statement means.

However, it is often more complex, more costly and more open to fraud and error than a universal benefit system.

There's a balance to be struck somewhere in the middle with a mix of the two IMO.
EHW 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Owner8627
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 02 200321 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th Feb 20 16:104th Feb 20 13:01LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Signature
Forever in Rented Accomodation

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:00 pm  
if everyone gets something, then surely there is no net benefit to the recipients, therefore no point in giving it to people.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels26578
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 08 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Jul 17 23:1930th Apr 17 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the set of NEDS...
Signature
Image


ebay's Rugby League Bargains ¦ Boost Your eBay Sales ¦ Recommended Amazon Stuff ¦ Get a Free Ink Cart!!! ¦ Quins RL T-Shirts, BRAND NEW DESIGNS

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:02 pm  
EHW wrote:
if everyone gets something, then surely there is no net benefit to the recipients, therefore no point in giving it to people.


Eh?
DaveO 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator14395No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 years331st
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th May 24 14:0028th May 22 23:44LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Chester
Signature
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20
Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18
Moderator

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:54 pm  
As I said on the Cameron thread that eventually was locked, "....there is another reason why the benefit was universal. It is to do with, ironically enough, being "all in it together". If you pay into the welfare state via taxes and NI and you also benefit from it (in this case via child benefit) then you have a stake in the system. If it is all one way traffic in that some people only ever pay in and are never eligible for any form of pay out, then sooner or later the system breaks down as those people begrudge paying anything in at all and start to support parties from the right to who promise them just that. We are well down that road and it is quite deliberate policy from the right which is very divisive."

So essentially non-means tested benefits are a way to give everyone a stake in the system. You pay National INSURANCE then when you need it the insurance policy pays out, no questions asked so to speak.

It's pretty obvious you can't have every benefit non-means tested but certain benefits such as child benefit lend themselves to being non means tested and the fact it now isn't despite the obvious flaws of the new system is all down to politics and the governments attempt to show "we are all in it together". What they failed to grasp is we were already all in it together with that particular benefit because anyone who had children qualified for the benefit.

Another thing in favour of universal benefits is means testing is a disincentive to work. There is in effect a high marginal tax rate applied to anyone who crosses the means testing boundary that would see them lose a benefit or a chunk of it. We also saw this with the way child benefit has been dealt with as with the original proposal (subsequently watered down) cross the boundary by a £1 and you lost over £1500 a year in a family with two kids.

So rather than take a promotion that would give someone a small pay-rise but make them worse off because they lose out on a means tested benefit people have a disincentive to take the promotion or a slightly better paid job.

I have a vague recollection from my childhood about my parents going on about "The Means Test" as something nasty that was introduced generally and I think they must have been referring to what happened in 1931 when the government introduced a household means test for any household where someone had been receiving insurance payments for 26 weeks. It was one of the things that led to the Jarrow March (proper name Jarrow Crusade) in 1936 but aport from that I think this household means test is where a lot of the stigma associated with means testing comes from which often leads to people not claiming what they are entitled.
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman6038No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Mar 17 10:5527th Feb 17 17:36LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Bradford

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:32 pm  
Whatever the original motives were behind universal benefits, that doesn't mean that the principle is still relevant.

I really doubt that wealthy people feel that they're getting something back because they receive child benefit, winter fuel payments, free bus passes etc. They just do not place much value on those types of benefits. They'll accept them, treating them as a bit of a joke, but still feel aggrieved by what they perceive to be high tax rates.

In this day and age it shouldn't be necessary to subject people to having to apply for these benefits. The tax system should be quite capable of excluding high earners from receiving them without any great cost. The idea that we might as well give them to everyone because its too expensive not to shouldn't be acceptable in 2013.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels26578
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 08 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Jul 17 23:1930th Apr 17 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the set of NEDS...
Signature
Image


ebay's Rugby League Bargains ¦ Boost Your eBay Sales ¦ Recommended Amazon Stuff ¦ Get a Free Ink Cart!!! ¦ Quins RL T-Shirts, BRAND NEW DESIGNS

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:44 pm  
Cibaman wrote:
Whatever the original motives were behind universal benefits, that doesn't mean that the principle is still relevant.


Indeed, though until quite recently family allowance was such a low amount that the costs of means testing would outweigh the saving, I'm yet to be convinced that still isn't the case. There aren't that many universal benefits now, means testing would be a hammer to crack a nut.

Cibaman wrote:
I really doubt that wealthy people feel that they're getting something back because they receive child benefit, winter fuel payments, free bus passes etc. They just do not place much value on those types of benefits. They'll accept them, treating them as a bit of a joke, but still feel aggrieved by what they perceive to be high tax rates.


You are probably right but as bus passes and free TV licences have to be applied for rather than come automatically you'd find those that don't need them don't apply for them.

Mind that doesn't mean the winter fuel payment is perfect, did you know it is paid to thousands of pensioners living abroad? That should be stopped as a priority.

Cibaman wrote:
In this day and age it shouldn't be necessary to subject people to having to apply for these benefits. The tax system should be quite capable of excluding high earners from receiving them without any great cost. The idea that we might as well give them to everyone because its too expensive not to shouldn't be acceptable in 2013.


That way means everyone filling is self assessment forms, HMRC can't cope with its current workload without have it increased massively, even this needs some admin and would more than likely mean stuff like family allowance remains largely non-means tested. The current shambles implemented by this current government shows what happens when you do things halfarsed.
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman6038No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Mar 17 10:5527th Feb 17 17:36LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Bradford

Re: Universal benefits vs Means-testing : Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:40 pm  
Big Graeme wrote:
Indeed, though until quite recently family allowance was such a low amount that the costs of means testing would outweigh the saving, I'm yet to be convinced that still isn't the case. There aren't that many universal benefits now, means testing would be a hammer to crack a nut.

You are probably right but as bus passes and free TV licences have to be applied for rather than come automatically you'd find those that don't need them don't apply for them.

Mind that doesn't mean the winter fuel payment is perfect, did you know it is paid to thousands of pensioners living abroad? That should be stopped as a priority.

That way means everyone filling is self assessment forms, HMRC can't cope with its current workload without have it increased massively, even this needs some admin and would more than likely mean stuff like family allowance remains largely non-means tested. The current shambles implemented by this current government shows what happens when you do things halfarsed.


High earners are already subject to self assessment.
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 207 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
26m
2025 Season tickets
Bullseye
29
Recent
2025 Kits
Dave K.
32
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
16s
Pre Season - 2025
Chris71
225
18s
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
20s
Call for funds
Listenup94
197
28s
2025 Season tickets
Bullseye
29
29s
Salford
Wires71
68
36s
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
46s
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
1m
Refs referring it to video as a try or not
karetaker
45
1m
Rumours and signings v9
Big Steve
28923
1m
Planning for next season
Binosh
201
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
TODAY
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
26m
2025 Season tickets
Bullseye
29
Recent
2025 Kits
Dave K.
32
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
16s
Pre Season - 2025
Chris71
225
18s
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
20s
Call for funds
Listenup94
197
28s
2025 Season tickets
Bullseye
29
29s
Salford
Wires71
68
36s
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
46s
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
1m
Refs referring it to video as a try or not
karetaker
45
1m
Rumours and signings v9
Big Steve
28923
1m
Planning for next season
Binosh
201
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
TODAY
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!