Re: 2012 Fixtures : Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:04 pm  

Would the main obstacle be that they don't want us ?

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:24 pm  

Yes for sure, I think that they made it plain when they were asked before.

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:49 pm  

Not much point in discussing the "advantages" then.

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:45 pm  

No I guess not unless they would be more sympathetic if asked again.

So so disappointed how the Lane arrangement has ended up. . . . But typical United and that's from someone who's watched over 500 football games there. The directors are the sole reason I stopped going there.

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:28 pm  

griff1998 wrote:

Would the main obstacle be that they don't want us ?

Was Sir Milan Mandaric there the last time we enquired?

Just a thought...

[Hillsborough Lad]

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:41 pm  

No, he wasn't. It was the old board that were too busy suing people with cancer to worry about having to paint rugby lines on the pitch.

Might be worth giving him a ring.

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:45 am  

Maybe we could have a word with Rotherham,The New York Stadium?Maybe the USA could get there world cup games played there.

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:23 pm  

new york stadium would be great you'd think the millars would jump at the chance of getting someone else to contribute to the cost of the stadium - they can't be well off.

and we now have a clue about Keith (know different topic) - but lets think young agile Misi or getting on and a bit arthritic keith hmmm?

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:43 pm  

It's in Rotherham.

End of discussion.

Re: 2012 Fixtures : Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:32 am  

You could support your home town team then