Re: Sam Barlow : Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:38 am  

Peter Green went off with Peck injury.

Re: Sam Barlow : Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:50 am  

supercracker wrote:

Peter Green went off with Peck injury.

Bloody Seagullls...

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:07 am  

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y11/to ... tbarlo.jpg. lol nearly as funny as the contract.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y11/to ... tbarlo.jpg. lol nearly as funny as the contract.

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:25 pm  

That is so funny I suppose the dole que and making silly photobucket things are the only things to do in Halifax,Not got much else going for it.

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:28 pm  

EAGLEBLADE II wrote:

That is so funny I suppose the dole que and making silly photobucket things are the only things to do in Halifax,Not got much else going for it.

As opposed to a heavily run down city with more unemployed than most places in the north !!! lol the difference is most people in Fax are literate enough to read and write

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:40 pm  

Faxhali wrote:

As opposed to a heavily run down city with more unemployed than most places in the north !!! lol the difference is most people in Fax are literate enough to read and write

.........as long as it's not in a contract, obviously.

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:15 pm  

I'm not a fan of clauses like this. The big games should have the best players playing in them. This lad shouldn't miss out because of spite/ fear from another club.

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:33 pm  

mrs goggins wrote:

I'm not a fan of clauses like this. The big games should have the best players playing in them. This lad shouldn't miss out because of spite/ fear from another club.

He could always have honoured the contract which he cheerfully signed last year. Then there'd have been no problem.

Contract breakers have to take the rough with the smooth.

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:45 pm  

griff1998 wrote:

He could always have honoured the contract which he cheerfully signed last year. Then there'd have been no problem.

Contract breakers have to take the rough with the smooth.

AGREED

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:51 pm  

I dont dispute that's it's a contractual issue and if it is legally binding that he can't play gainst Sheffield then of course, he shouldn't play. I still don't like these types of clauses. I just think rugby should be played on a pitch not in solicitors offices and court rooms.