Re: Implications for Crusaders ? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:25 pm  

chubbs1981 wrote:

Surely not?

I was right about a boycott though

Still if you can do an 8,000 crowd against 'Ull with a boycott in place it doesn't look too bad for you lot.

Just someone tell Moss not to do another "Samuel" and keep him off messageboards, cos it all adds up!

Re: Implications for Crusaders ? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:39 pm  

Grendel wrote:

I was right about a boycott though

Still if you can do an 8,000 crowd against 'Ull with a boycott in place it doesn't look too bad for you lot.

Just someone tell Moss not to do another "Samuel" and keep him off messageboards, cos it all adds up!

mate what bloody boycott? how on earyh does a poll on a website where 70% of the respondents say they will NOT boycott cru games end up being an actual boycott? no-one has organised anything beyond the actual poll!

Re: Implications for Crusaders ? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:51 pm  

People were talking about it on here, so I assumed it was happening, and given Moss' statements would not have been surprised.

If it doesn't then all to the good for you lot.

A lot of Gogs have bought into this ( a lot more than we in the South did ) so whatever foul deeds were done to make this move, they had no part of it and deserve their shot. Hence my revised view.

Re: Implications for Crusaders ? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:01 pm  

Boycott of games by the masses (or the few) has been averted. Theres still upset with the reason why it was going to be implemented (some people still boycotting club shop).

Geoff Moss did manage to get some credibility back with quite alot of fans by replying to most fans emails who had concerns. Also the new look board held a fans forum a couple of days ago, which was to show the fans of Wrexham FC & Crusaders RL there vision of going forward. Not many turned up, but those that did, seemed to be quite happy with the new Chairman Ian Roberts. So hopefully the Issues will get resolved soon.