: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:12 pm  

crackers_HKR wrote:

Whilst reading this post was fun, lets get to reality. I can't see HKR getting anything from St's, therefore i'm going to plump for a 34-18 Saints victory.

oi, you'll get banned for that kind of logic!

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:34 pm  

Saints 32 - rovers 16

[Mild Rover]

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:14 pm  

Score update:
Saints 0 Rovers 0

I see no reason to let a bunch of sub-scouse hucksters start gloating in advance. Deydodohdontdeydoh?

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:06 pm  

Well I fancy our chances tonight especially against a weakened Saints team.

Saints 12 v HKR 16

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:10 pm  

18 - 12 to Rovers .

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:00 pm  

Saints by a cricket score

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:12 pm  

GJB wrote:

Fox is far quicker than Gardner and no way is Gilmour "far, far quicker" than Webster. Lovegrove is pretty nippy and plays centre also, so I doubt Fas is quicker!

I expect a Saints win tomorrow, you obviously have a much stronger side, but some of your evalutions are also one eyed and amusing! And allthough no doubt Graham is the better player, I'm not so sure he's bigger than Fozzard. Daniel Anderson didnt seem to think so when refering to Fozz as possibily "the biggest body you have" when you were missing a few big blokes last year.

Gilmour is fast. He burned Martin Gleeson against the Wire. You'll see when he skins Webster/Welham/Whoever tonight down our left-hand side.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:17 pm  

As for my prediction, I'll go for Saints by 38.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:57 pm  

~ No1 Saints Fan ~ wrote:

Gilmour is fast. He burned Martin Gleeson against the Wire. You'll see when he skins Webster/Welham/Whoever tonight down our left-hand side.

Oh dear god.

Gleeson didn't even play you feck witted half brain.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:06 pm  

Superb thread