Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:42 pm  

roversmad wrote:

Where's he gone?

Oh come on, now you're just antagonising him, that really isn't fair, we'd both moved on and everything

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:47 pm  

bob bob bobin robin wrote:

Oh come on, now you're just antagonising him, that really isn't fair, we'd both moved on and everything

Re: larroyer charged : Fri Jul 24, 2015 10:48 am  

I'm happy that an actual professional referee, who is an expert in his field, saw the FACT that it wasn't a shoulder charge.

Time to get out of the bitter barn!

Re: larroyer charged : Fri Jul 24, 2015 1:35 pm  

*1865* wrote:

I'm happy that an actual professional referee, who is an expert in his field, saw the FACT that it wasn't a shoulder charge.

Time to get out of the bitter barn!

On the initial report it said "shoulder charge used", they just contradict themselves and make themselves look even more stupid I don't even know why I'm getting involved, can't be arsed to link it and don't even care to be fair. Got bored of the ridiculous, corrupt, I consistant RFL ruining the game a long long time ago.

Re: larroyer charged : Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:43 pm  

Anyway, glad we've all agreed that watts didn't shoulder charge kelly

Re: larroyer charged : Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:48 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Anyway, glad we've all agreed that watts didn't shoulder charge kelly

I think he did

Re: larroyer charged : Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:54 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

I think he did

You can't change your mind now