Re: larroyer charged : Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:17 pm  

Well, well, well!

User Actions
Following

RFL RefereesVerified account
‏@RFLReferees
.@RobJohnson07035 - The definition on a shoulder charge is arm tucked and rotation. Tackler does neither so happy it's not a shoulder
8:42 AM - 22 Jul 2015

You don't have to apologise lads, it's ok.

Re: larroyer charged : Wed Jul 22, 2015 8:09 pm  

*1865* wrote:

Well, well, well!

User Actions
Following

RFL RefereesVerified account
‏@RFLReferees
.@RobJohnson07035 - The definition on a shoulder charge is arm tucked and rotation. Tackler does neither so happy it's not a shoulder
8:42 AM - 22 Jul 2015

You don't have to apologise lads, it's ok.

If you need a bit of back up to get yourself on that disciplinary panel,DES is your man.

Re: larroyer charged : Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:04 pm  

*1865* wrote:

I've no problem admitting when i'm wrong. But only when I actually am.

Yet you can't on this occasion even when proven wrong by the RFL review!! Sometimes a little humility and admittance goes a long way to showing the sort of person you are......says it all really.

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:15 am  

bob bob bobin robin wrote:

Yet you can't on this occasion even when proven wrong by the RFL review!! Sometimes a little humility and admittance goes a long way to showing the sort of person you are......says it all really.

Well, as the RFLReferees Twitter account (which is controlled by the referees themselves) says, I wasn't wrong.

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:00 am  

*1865* wrote:

Well, as the RFLReferees Twitter account (which is controlled by the referees themselves) says, I wasn't wrong.

Congratulations. The last time I looked the RFL could overrule/ disagree refereeing decisions (they are employed by the RFL after all) based on panel reviews - which is exactly what has happened here. On this occasion I'm happy that you're wrong and that you clearly are a complete tool!

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:12 pm  

bob bob bobin robin wrote:

Congratulations. The last time I looked the RFL could overrule/ disagree refereeing decisions (they are employed by the RFL after all) based on panel reviews - which is exactly what has happened here. On this occasion I'm happy that you're wrong and that you clearly are a complete tool!

You mean you'll trust someone that writes on the website over an actual referee?

Each to their own.

Think it's time you let it go.

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 8:38 pm  

*1865* wrote:

You mean you'll trust someone that writes on the website over an actual referee?

Each to their own.

Think it's time you let it go.

Right back at you with that last comment. Lets just agree that I (along with every other sane person who isn't wearing blinkers) think it was a shoulder charge, and you think it wasn't. Does that finally calm you down and make you happy?

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 9:55 pm  

bob bob bobin robin wrote:

Right back at you with that last comment. Lets just agree that I (along with every other sane person who isn't wearing blinkers) think it was a shoulder charge, and you think it wasn't. Does that finally calm you down and make you happy?

Where's he gone?

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 9:56 pm  

hes hiding like the rest of us lol

Re: larroyer charged : Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:03 pm  

hull2524 wrote:

hes hiding like the rest of us lol

Your hiding place is a bit naff!