bishops finger wrote:
Will the RFL ban every player who attacks the legs for 4 games or just the ones that cause injury, can of worms been opened IMO.
The clowns of red Hall strike again. I've said it before and I'll say it again.
The numpties that run Red hall are so inconsistent that I'm sure the word itself was created and printed in the English dictionary especially for them.
If the tackle had been malicious with an intent to injure, then a ban would have been rightly forthcoming, however, after carefully watching the tackle on TV several times I didn't see anything that warranted a 4 match ban.
As a result of this verdict I believe the RFL have set a precedent and it will be interesting to see what they do in future games when you see the likes of Wigan players in particular employing that type of tackle in a game. Perhaps in future we should notify them every time such tackle takes place that is seen on the TV and if no action is taken ask them.... why not.?
Just don't expect an honest or logic answer from them.
Complete goons the lot of them, once again the disciplinary panel as a result of their actions, are made to look inconsistent and amateurish.
