Re: Well, that was fun! : Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:24 pm  

Green is still banned.

Blair, Donaldson, Greenwood & Horne doubts.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:01 pm  

Right now, apparently both Hull and Rervers will struggle to field 17 fit blokes for next week's derby. I've had the SOS call from the club asking me to turn up for training on Monday, but I refused as the club won't consider a loan offer. My missus has me down to take her to the garden centre.

Hull could recall Jordan Babdul from his loan, as Pryce is finally not justifying his salary and Tuimavave is crocked. There's always dependable and versatile Danny W.

You couldn't make it up. Imagine the Black and Whites having to play a game this season with several key players out injured. Don't know how they'll cope.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:05 pm  

SirStan wrote:

Green is still banned.

Blair, Donaldson, Greenwood & Horne doubts.

I'd have doubts about Dixon and Larroyer too, even if fit to play.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:16 pm  

Seventies red wrote: It looks like it was grounded short and bounced at the same time. Certainly not a penalty try in my opinion, only that chocolate fireguard Thaler, could have seen so differently. https://www.facebook.com/Hull-fchull-kr ... 169914293/ I've watched that on several platforms now and can't come to any real conclusion. I'd like a clarification of the laws of the game. Is it a penalty if Allgood accidentally kicks the ball because I can't see how he could possibly do it on purpose? (Waits for Mild Rover to look up laws for me because I can't be bothered). Last night was the absolute definition of a game of two halves, we were awful in the first and Huddersfield were pretty good, vice versa in the second half. Ta'ai and Rapira were tearing us up in the first half and then did nothing in the second and all of the Huddersfield team decided to ignore their International class three quarters for the majority of the game. Lawler went really well for us and looks a potentially decent larker, really can't see what so offended Picky about Super Kev.

Seventies red wrote: It looks like it was grounded short and bounced at the same time. Certainly not a penalty try in my opinion, only that chocolate fireguard Thaler, could have seen so differently. https://www.facebook.com/Hull-fchull-kr ... 169914293/ I've watched that on several platforms now and can't come to any real conclusion. I'd like a clarification of the laws of the game. Is it a penalty if Allgood accidentally kicks the ball because I can't see how he could possibly do it on purpose? (Waits for Mild Rover to look up laws for me because I can't be bothered). Last night was the absolute definition of a game of two halves, we were awful in the first and Huddersfield were pretty good, vice versa in the second half. Ta'ai and Rapira were tearing us up in the first half and then did nothing in the second and all of the Huddersfield team decided to ignore their International class three quarters for the majority of the game. Lawler went really well for us and looks a potentially decent larker, really can't see what so offended Picky about Super Kev.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:01 am  

Pickering Red wrote:

Right now, apparently both Hull and Rervers will struggle to field 17 fit blokes for next week's derby. I've had the SOS call from the club asking me to turn up for training on Monday, but I refused as the club won't consider a loan offer. My missus has me down to take her to the garden centre.

Hull could recall Jordan Babdul from his loan, as Pryce is finally not justifying his salary and Tuimavave is crocked. There's always dependable and versatile Danny W.

You couldn't make it up. Imagine the Black and Whites having to play a game this season with several key players out injured. Don't know how they'll cope.

Like we did against Warrington at home?

Jordan Abdul isn't on loan anymore.

To be honest I'm nor sure what this post is about, nobody has moaned about injuries ahead of this game have they, certainly not in masses like other clubs.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:19 am  

That's because you haven't had injuries anything like other clubs.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:43 am  

SirStan wrote:

That's because you haven't had injuries anything like other clubs.

I don't have too much sympathy with clubs who sign injury prone players and choose not to run a reserve team.

No coincidence that 4/5 have reserve teams IMO.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:47 am  

SirStan wrote:

That's because you haven't had injuries anything like other clubs.

We have, we just don't whine about it.

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sun Jul 10, 2016 10:00 am  

Short memory..typical curly turd

Re: Well, that was fun! : Sun Jul 10, 2016 11:55 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

We have, we just don't whine about it.

Wronggggggg.

At worst this season you have had 3 first choice team members missing from the matchday 17 for every fixture so far. Your spine has been mainly healthy and your front row.

Saints, Wigan, Wire, Cas, Hudds, Leeds, Rovers and possibly Wakey have had more than their fair share of first choice absentees this year for every game.