[Roland_R]

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:49 am  

Matty wrote:

:oops:

Back on topic please

If your minority of fans hadnt de-railed the thread i'd be pretty much on topic. I was well stating that i beleive he's not worth a contract extension??

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:51 am  

Matty wrote:

:oops:

Back on topic please

Ok, you're skint.....THIS POST RELATES TO THE OPENING POST SO IF YOU WANT TO DELETE AGAIN I SUGGEST YOU LOOK AT THE INTENTION OF THIS THREAD....

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:52 am  

1865 wrote:

If your minority of fans hadnt de-railed the thread i'd be pretty much on topic. I was well stating that i beleive he's not worth a contract extension??

edit:- please teacher it was not me

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:53 am  

1865 wrote:

I was well stating that i beleive he's not worth a contract extension??

Who's better available? Great knowledge of the game, especially locally - lots of contacts. We need continuity, especially in our back room staff which hasn't been the case in recent years.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:54 am  

[quote="1865"]So why you got 1553 posts :lol: Chomp chomp chomp....


Maybe you should look how long it is since I posted, that would give you a more accurate view sherlock.

[Roland_R]

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:57 am  

Matty wrote:

Who's better available? Great knowledge of the game, especially locally - lots of contacts. We need continuity, especially in our back room staff which hasn't been the case in recent years.

Fair point, but you was doing so well without him, i wouldnt say you've been anything out the ordinary since he signed. I just dont see how you'll find continuity in an old style conditioner especially with Sports Science and the improvements in it these days.

I feel he'll lagg behind as a conditioner.. prove me wrong! I dont know whos available but im sure there's somewhere out there... there always is!

Reenyrobin wrote:

1865 wrote:

So why you got 1553 posts :lol: Chomp chomp chomp....

Maybe you should look how long it is since I posted, that would give you a more accurate view sherlock.

Chomp.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:59 am  

Stan Butler wrote:

Ok, you're skint.....THIS POST RELATES TO THE OPENING POST SO IF YOU WANT TO DELETE AGAIN I SUGGEST YOU LOOK AT THE INTENTION OF THIS THREAD....

O.k then Stan, have it your way, we are skint! Of course we are, because Newton will be on peanuts won't he? Again, you are pathetic as is the origional poster. Billy has been given an extention because he is doing a great job and our coach is more than happy. And if you don't mind I'll take his opinion over yours or any of the self deluded (minority) black and white fans any day.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:59 am  

Reenyrobin wrote:

O.k then Stan, have it your way, we are skint! Of course we are, because Newton will be on peanuts won't he? Again, you are pathetic as is the origional poster. Billy has been given an extention because he is doing a great job and our coach is more than happy. And if you don't mind I'll take his opinion over yours or any of the self deluded (minority) black and white fans any day.

Chomp Chomp Chomp

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:01 am  

when billy left fc they finished near the bottom and where shook p by his loss rover have gone from strength to strength every year so i think that explains it hull are doing well this year because they have had to change there ways now but billy has only made the team better so you have nothing to prove he hasnt

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:01 am  

Reenyrobin wrote:

O.k then Stan, have it your way, we are skint! Of course we are, because Newton will be on peanuts won't he? Again, you are pathetic as is the origional poster. Billy has been given an extention because he is doing a great job and our coach is more than happy. And if you don't mind I'll take his opinion over yours or any of the self deluded (minority) black and white fans any day.

That is low