Re: 12 nil up then lose 16 48 : Sat Jun 18, 2016 8:51 am  

I think he means common denominator.

Re: 12 nil up then lose 16 48 : Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:34 pm  

He did, embarrassed face.

And yes, Poching.

Re: 12 nil up then lose 16 48 : Sun Jun 19, 2016 7:33 am  

Sandro II Terrorista wrote:

He did, embarrassed face.

And yes, Poching.

Got to agree can not get my head round the fact that he was a good second else were, but not for us when the new coach who ever he is he will get rid i hope

Re: 12 nil up then lose 16 48 : Sun Jun 19, 2016 1:45 pm  

The extremes in performance that this current Rovers side keep delivering even throughout a single 80 minute game are alarming. We can't hang on to leads, we cannot defend out wide and our indiscipline invites opposition teams back into the game.

So here's the rub. We are unbelievably inconsistent and we can't handle pressure, so what makes anyone think we will be able to handle the tinderbox big game pressure of the MPG, as that's most likely where we are heading?

I love to be positive, but the omens for this season really don't look good for us anymore. Anyone who thinks we are by definition much superior to current Championship sides are frankly deluding themselves tbh after that second half performance last Friday. I really hope I'm wrong.

Re: 12 nil up then lose 16 48 : Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:43 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

The extremes in performance that this current Rovers side keep delivering even throughout a single 80 minute game are alarming. We can't hang on to leads, we cannot defend out wide and our indiscipline invites opposition teams back into the game.

So here's the rub. We are unbelievably inconsistent and we can't handle pressure, so what makes anyone think we will be able to handle the tinderbox big game pressure of the MPG, as that's most likely where we are heading?

I love to be positive, but the omens for this season really don't look good for us anymore. Anyone who thinks we are by definition much superior to current Championship sides are frankly deluding themselves tbh after that second half performance last Friday. I really hope I'm wrong.

I and hundreds more hope you are wrong we can only

[Mild Rover]

Re: 12 nil up then lose 16 48 : Mon Jun 20, 2016 5:20 pm  

cravenpark1 wrote:

Got to agree can not get my head round the fact that he was a good second else were, but not for us when the new coach who ever he is he will get rid i hope

Tbf, he was working with better players in more competitive teams.

I'm not saying he shouldn't take his share of responsibility or that he necessarily should be retained under the new head coach - but our issues go deeper than one common denominator and won't be solved by pinning the blame on a single scapegoat. If only it was that easy!