New team selection screen : Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:46 pm  

Like the new look screen for editing teams. Can I assume that the "save selection" button means the end of the previous fault in editting teams from previous years (the one involving trying to make changes where you had to temporarily have 4 players from one team).

Re: New team selection screen : Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:53 pm  

FoxyRhino wrote:

Like the new look screen for editing teams. Can I assume that the "save selection" button means the end of the previous fault in editting teams from previous years (the one involving trying to make changes where you had to temporarily have 4 players from one team).

I think its more to do with the 'wasting transfers without confirming your changes' arguement that has gone on for years!

Re: New team selection screen : Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:20 pm  

pokerface wrote:

I think its more to do with the 'wasting transfers without confirming your changes' arguement that has gone on for years!

Looks like it after some experimentation. Still applies the 4 players/team and salary cap.

Re: New team selection screen : Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:25 pm  

FoxyRhino wrote:

Looks like it after some experimentation. Still applies the 4 players/team and salary cap.

I think you mean 3 players per team?!

Re: New team selection screen : Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:37 pm  

You will not be charged for changes until you click on the Save Team button to commit the changes. At which point the only the differences between your current selection and your previously saved team will count.

This should allow you to both experiment with different line ups and make those double changes that require you to go via a third line up without losing an extra change.

Re: New team selection screen : Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:29 pm  

SBR wrote:

You will not be charged for changes until you click on the Save Team button to commit the changes. At which point the only the differences between your current selection and your previously saved team will count.

This should allow you to both experiment with different line ups and make those double changes that require you to go via a third line up without losing an extra change.

Thanks for confirming that. That was the point I was making. Im glad you managed to come up with something like that.