: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:33 pm  

Haighy wrote:

I think it was last year they changed the ruling that if a 2 on 1 steal occurs in the in-goal area then it isn't a penalty try, just a penalty 10 yards back.

I don't think Bradford deserved their penalty try today however.

your joking right?
i thought it could of even been a sending off, the player was guarenteed to score, and the player intentially took him high as he had no other way of stopping him as he would of been brushed off, could of been a jaw breaker. Credit to the bradford player who played on and scored anyway

: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:48 pm  

Bizzare rule change when you think abouty it.

SHould have scored from the attack though

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:34 am  

the day will come wrote:

i think bradford were done by that penalty try as they had scored it should have been a try with a penelty awarded as well an 8 point try would have won them the game

Only happens if the player is fouled after the act of scoring. In which case the try would have stood where it was scored then an extra kick taken from beneath the posts. So wouldnt have been a guarenteed 8 points anyway.