Did we miss him as an un used sub? will people have a go at Agar like the last time he unsued a sub?

Agar made the correct decision...

Not really. I would prefer the coach to play the game in front of him rather then make changes for changes sake. I would say our backs played very well in the second half and we clearly had the momentum so bringing Hall on may just have disrupted that.

There already having a go viewtopic.php?f=34&t=458977

There already having a go viewtopic.php?f=34&t=458977

Quote Sheldon="Sheldon"There already having a go viewtopic.php?f=34&t=458977'" Ah missed that, thank you! sack the board, sack Agar

Quote Sheldon="Sheldon"There already having a go viewtopic.php?f=34&t=458977'" Ah missed that, thank you! sack the board, sack Agar

correct decision from agar, hall is very unpredictable in defence and taking a back off when they was all having their best game for a long time would have been suicide, iv been an agar nocker, and i said in other posts if we won 3 out of 4 against cats cas saints and salford then il give credit, as i wanted him to turn it round, well i have to say well done agar for what ever was said at half time, very clever interchanges at vital times and and well done to all the players for responding and playing the brand of rugby our great club wants to see, passion, enthusiasm, never say die attitude, skill and mean defence especially in the second half, and danny houghton gets huge praise as every time graham drove the ball in he did his best to target houghton and he stood his ground and never let him win the floor, he is turning into a top quality hooker in d and attack, hope that type of performance is hear to stay.

whiting obviously thought he was on the pitch as his winger

i woulden't have put Hall on as i simply don't have confidence in his abilities in such a tense and loud atmosphere, he'd have been highly likely to knock-on, fall over and generally mess up.



which is why I don't think we should retain him

contract talks seem to revolve around houghton,fitz,and tickle(looks to be failing on getting him to sign tho').it seems to have gone quiet with hall.

They should be the top 3 priorities. As has been said already, though, I'd hope the club has a straight answer from Tickle and if it's no, that we're moving on. Sounds like we've made him a decent offer, if he wants to go, good luck to him - been a very good player for us.

i would hope that he has been given some sort of 'deadline' to either accept or decline a new deal,so we can put the feelers out for a new 2nd rower,unless the club think we are suitably covered as it is?

Interesting. www.sporthull.co.uk/headlines/HU ... ticle.html

Interesting. www.sporthull.co.uk/headlines/HU ... ticle.html