Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:05 pm  

Mild Rover wrote:

Does that mean we only have 2 years more to hear about Hudgell's comments of 2009 that some people inferred were about Hull FC's announcement of their signing of Craig Fitzgibbon?

How would Rovers have known to make an initial approach to Cooke? Rhetorical question, obviously.

Anyway, it's nice that we're all on the same page with this stuff now and can recognise sabre-rattling nonsense for what it is.

I'm a girl though, could you have missed the point more spectacularly?

A couple of minutes ago there were 3 Rovers posters and 40 guests on your board, but 6 Rovers posters, a shedload of Hull fans (Goldie's 7 by 5) and 162 guests on here. This is not unusual. Sterile.

[Mild Rover]

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:09 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

I'm a girl though, could you have missed the point more spectacularly?

A couple of minutes ago there were 3 Rovers posters and 40 guests on your board, but 6 Rovers posters, a shedload of Hull fans (Goldie's 7 by 5) and 162 guests on here. This is not unusual. Sterile.

Choice between tumbleweed and towering inferno, innit?

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:10 pm  

Mild Rover wrote:

Hitting the heights, the night!

Good signing for you still, I reckon. And in this season of relegation, when the RL family will no doubt be revealed to be more akin to the Borgias than the Waltons, it makes everybody but Bradford a little safer. Ta.

You thanking us when you have the self-professed best pack in the comp? Bit odd.

I liked the Waltons. Full of self-congratulatory gingers, heart-warmingly they felt very familiar.

[Mild Rover]

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:11 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

You thanking us when you have the self-professed best pack in the comp? Bit odd.

I liked the Waltons. Full of self-congratulatory gingers, heart-warmingly they felt very familiar.

You know me - pessimistic tendencies.

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:14 pm  

Mild Rover wrote:

Choice between tumbleweed and towering inferno, innit?

If I ever start posting on other clubs' boards exclusively to bitch about Rovers signing their players, you have permission to shoot me.

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:17 pm  

Mild Rover wrote:

You know me - pessimistic tendencies.

Not ginger though.

Gareth Carvell is a very good signing, and I am delighted. Get Tuson in and our pack's shaping up OK.

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:41 am  

Delighted with this welcome back Carvel, some grunt with pea and feka, if the halfs click we are shaping up a bit better not expecting top 4 but top 6 could be makeable now, bit of a transition year this I think

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:42 am  

ccs wrote:

TUPE does allow resignation, but we'll have to wait and see.....

An employee has the right to object to the transfer and this has the effect of terminating their employment.
However, that termination would in most circumstances be taken to be a resignation by the employee.An objection is not treated as a dismissal unless the transfer would involve a substantial and detrimental change to their working conditions.
In those circumstances it may amount to constructive unfair dismissal.
There is no right to take redundancy in this situation

Thats the key bit for me, Carvell objected to the transfer and effectively resigned from his contract of employment

The constructive, unfair dismissal element is irrelivant unless Carvell was looking to make a claim against the Bulls which he isn't. If Bulls did change his conditions i.e reduce his salary that would just have lent further weight to his case.

Have you sent them their car back yet Gaz? Roll on Friday.....

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:39 am  

SirStan wrote:

I hope for your sake you have evidence to support this allegation, as its already been investigated by the rfl and they didnt agree with you. Perhaps you can send them this new information?

That is the truth he was my coach at the time, loads went on even stuff that happened to Paul I don't agree with, but like people say its happened so move on.

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:37 am  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Was Ben Cockayne in it, kicking back, so to speak?

Was jason crookes in it,assault of the earth,so to speak?