Re: expectations : Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:11 pm  

ccs wrote:

I suppose that when you describe last season as "dire", our Wembley backs must have been "rubbish" at the very least.

definitely

Re: expectations : Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:27 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Are you ray french's lad? He used to say it every time he commentated on a cup game

No, if he'd been my dad I'd have run away from home.

Re: expectations : Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:09 pm  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

Expectations and where we should finish with the quality of squad we have amassed seem to have a huge disparity.
If Radford can't reach top 4 and secure a play off with this squad (the best we have assembled in years) he should be shot. Anything less (barring a CC win) frankly should be considered another failure, I can't believe people are saying 6th is considered a success, how quickly we forget!

The best squad Radders & motu have assembled, not we.
After all you did judge him with PG/bombers squad.