: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:16 am  

Forever FC wrote: http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league/hull_fc/news/displayarticle.php?ID=11675 Yeah 80mins for Whiting

Forever FC wrote: http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league/hull_fc/news/displayarticle.php?ID=11675 Yeah 80mins for Whiting

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:22 am  

Maloney played and we were out muscled up front!

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:26 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

Maloney played and we were out muscled up front!

Hence Moa playing first team and not Maloney!

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:30 am  

Irregs #16 wrote:

Hence Moa playing first team and not Maloney!

Yup, was just wondering what the people had to say about this that were voicing their concerns about Moa being chosen in front of him?

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:32 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

Yup, was just wondering what the people had to say about this that were voicing their concerns about Moa being chosen in front of him?

that was me only because i think maloney is quite cute sorry that is a rubbish girlie reason

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:32 am  

If we want to seriously develop players in this country, we really need to raise the profile of the reserves nationally.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:35 am  

Isaiah wrote:

If we want to seriously develop players in this country, we really need to raise the profile of the reserves nationally.

exactly i stayed to watch the 1st 10mins of the game on sunday but many people went home. would of been a better option to play the reserves before the game on sunday.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:35 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

Yup, was just wondering what the people had to say about this that were voicing their concerns about Moa being chosen in front of him?

Speaking for myself I suggested Maloney must either be struggling or else could feel mistreated. It appears he's struggling, which is fair enough.

However I still maintain that until Moa gets closer to fitness we could use a bench spot better than for a single 15 minute spell. If Washbrook and Berrigan are both fit I'd prefer him to play for longer in the academy this weekend.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:37 am  

carl_spackler wrote:

Speaking for myself I suggested Maloney must either be struggling or else could feel mistreated. It appears he's struggling, which is fair enough.

However I still maintain that until Moa gets closer to fitness we could use a bench spot better than for a single 15 minute spell. If Washbrook and Berrigan are both fit I'd prefer him to play for longer in the academy this weekend.

Was surprised Washy didnt play in the academy. Personally i can see Lauaki and Crocker here in the next week or two meaning Moa will drop to the reserves anyway. If Washy is fit v Bradford he will come in for Berrigan if he isnt 100%, Whiting may be worth a spot somewhere too.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:41 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

Was surprised Washy didnt play in the academy. Personally i can see Lauaki and Crocker here in the next week or two meaning Moa will drop to the reserves anyway. If Washy is fit v Bradford he will come in for Berrigan if he isnt 100%, Whiting may be worth a spot somewhere too.

Maybe they want to test Moa now so that if Luauki and Crocker do get here they can send him back to the reserves knowing exactly what needs to be worked on within his game?

Either way if they both come then I would not like to pick our pack/bench