Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:18 am  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Look, come on here and slate Agar if you must, that's fair enough and a well-ploughed furrow. It gives you away that the vast majority of your 81 points to date are praising Rovers and slating Rule/Agar/season pass sales/value for money we get from players/Shaun Berrigan. Here is the evidence. You give yourself away, sir :
Praising Rovers (including Fox, S Briscoe, Rovers have more ambition, were unlucky to lose the regular round derbies) 11
Criticising Agar 9
Criticising Rule/the board 7
Picking a fight with FC Wembley 08 6
Criticising the squad 5
Negative spin on season pass sales 5
Criticising youth development 3
Belittling Shaun Berrigan 3
Bigging up Willie Mason 2
Protesting you're not a Rovers fan 3
Belittling Reece Lyne 1
Belittling Danny Houghton 1
Bringing up Michael Crocker 1

You've referred to Rovers at least 3 times as "top dogs" now in this thread about Warrington's salary cap. I know you love them, but that level of self-indulgence is embarrassing.

I think that's the RLFans equivalent to having this;

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:23 am  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Look, come on here and slate Agar if you must, that's fair enough and a well-ploughed furrow. It gives you away that the vast majority of your 81 points to date are praising Rovers and slating Rule/Agar/season pass sales/value for money we get from players/Shaun Berrigan. Here is the evidence. You give yourself away, sir :
Praising Rovers (including Fox, S Briscoe, Rovers have more ambition, were unlucky to lose the regular round derbies) 11
Criticising Agar 9
Criticising Rule/the board 7
Picking a fight with FC Wembley 08 6
Criticising the squad 5
Negative spin on season pass sales 5
Criticising youth development 3
Belittling Shaun Berrigan 3
Bigging up Willie Mason 2
Protesting you're not a Rovers fan 3
Belittling Reece Lyne 1
Belittling Danny Houghton 1
Bringing up Michael Crocker 1

You've referred to Rovers at least 3 times as "top dogs" now in this thread about Warrington's salary cap. I know you love them, but that level of self-indulgence is embarrassing.

Fascinating attempt at presenting your interpretations as fact, nice try... I'm just here for a debate though and by doing stuff like that you're showing you can't win it.

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:24 am  

I almost forgot that this thread was about Warrington signing Joel Monaghan

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:35 am  

who gives a flying f-ck about warrington or any other club,thought this was a fc forum

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:26 am  

garry brindley wrote:

:lol:

Fascinating attempt at presenting your interpretations as fact, nice try... I'm just here for a debate though and by doing stuff like that you're showing you can't win it.

Not at all. You wanted some statistical analysis. How else would you "interpret" the following (can't be @rsed posting all 83 gems):

"Rovers are top dogs in the city because they have a superior derby record since their return to SL and gone further in the competition than us for 3 years running."
"Rovers have a better coach than us based on what they have both achieved over the same time frame."
"I acknowledge they are top dogs in our city and have been for some time."
"I don't think it's fair to say that just because Fox was so outstanding in 2009 that he made the dream team, the fact he didn't make it in 2010 means he's 'gone backwards"
"I seem to remember Mason having one of his best seasons ever last year.. If he doesn't make it over then that's all the better for us, but we're hardly in a position to crow about it after crocker?"
"I said he (Mason) was a bigger capture, i.e. a bigger name, which he undoubtebly is... sure maybe he'll flop in SL next year but it's not likely."

Sorry, bud, but you were sort of doing OK on the Agar front, some credibility there. To let it get run away with you and slate the board, the youth development system, season pass sales, Hougton, Lyne, Berrigan, and refer multiple times to Rovers as "top dogs" was amusing. I think it's the love-in for Fox and the ridiculous statement that in the hypothetical scenario of Mason not coming it the pi$$-taking would be tempered by Crocker not getting here that just blows it apart, I'm afraid. You are General Zod, who also much used the phrase "top dogs", incidentally, and I claim my £5.

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:28 am  

Does every thread on here turn into a FC-KR sausage fest c-ck measuring contest ?

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:35 am  

garry brindley wrote:

Rovers have a better coach than us based on what they have both achieved over the same time frame. I really don't think you'll find a fan of any other club who would think that Agar was better than Morgan.. Infact, I remember reading this forum the day Agar got his new contract and fans of other clubs were coming on here to pass on their sympathies and disbelief.

Outsider looking in time again......I'm not sure where you get the idea that Morgan is a better coach than Agar, or that supporters of other clubs hold that view??....Personally, as I stated before, I believe that Agar is not good enough for a club of your stature and ambition.....As for Morgan, he's done a good job with Rovers, fetching them up from small club status to a well run, competitive Super League side, but similar to Hull with Agar, you get the impression that if Rovers are determined to make the big step to becoming a trophy winning side, then they need to bring in a top quality coach.

But as for Morgan being a significant better to Agar?....NO!!

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:04 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Not at all. You wanted some statistical analysis. How else would you "interpret" the following (can't be @rsed posting all 83 gems):

"Rovers are top dogs in the city because they have a superior derby record since their return to SL and gone further in the competition than us for 3 years running."
"Rovers have a better coach than us based on what they have both achieved over the same time frame."
"I acknowledge they are top dogs in our city and have been for some time."
"I don't think it's fair to say that just because Fox was so outstanding in 2009 that he made the dream team, the fact he didn't make it in 2010 means he's 'gone backwards"
"I seem to remember Mason having one of his best seasons ever last year.. If he doesn't make it over then that's all the better for us, but we're hardly in a position to crow about it after crocker?"
"I said he (Mason) was a bigger capture, i.e. a bigger name, which he undoubtebly is... sure maybe he'll flop in SL next year but it's not likely."

Sorry, bud, but you were sort of doing OK on the Agar front, some credibility there. To let it get run away with you and slate the board, the youth development system, season pass sales, Hougton, Lyne, Berrigan, and refer multiple times to Rovers as "top dogs" was amusing. I think it's the love-in for Fox and the ridiculous statement that in the hypothetical scenario of Mason not coming it the pi$$-taking would be tempered by Crocker not getting here that just blows it apart, I'm afraid. You are General Zod, who also much used the phrase "top dogs", incidentally, and I claim my £5.

Don't forget this little gold nugget Mrs B (regarding Reece Lyne);

garry brindley wrote:

Congatulations to Rhys!

Does concern me he's our only one though, think a club of our size and infrastructure should be producing much higher quality youngsters than we do. Prob get shot down but Lasty needs to be shown the door in my opinion

It seems Agar isn't the only one on his bulls-'hitlist'.

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:26 pm  

FC Wembley 08 wrote:

Don't forget this little gold nugget Mrs B (regarding Reece Lyne);

It seems Agar isn't the only one on his bulls-'hitlist'.

'oooh ooh me too me too', give it up mate you're no good at this forum debate thing, especially with your habit of quoting me to the detriment of the point your trying to make

I'l reply to the one with a brain now...

Re: Monaghan Signs for Wolves : Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:31 pm  

garry brindley wrote:

'oooh ooh me too me too', give it up mate you're no good at this forum debate thing, especially with your habit of quoting me to the detriment of the point your trying to make

I'l reply to the one with a brain now...

Lets get one thing clear: I am not your mate, and to think that, suggests that you yourself don't have much between the ears....
You carry on with you're 'debate' that you are doing soooo well with and i'll carry on in the adult conversations with my fellow fans. Not jumped up little pr1cks like you!!