: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:46 pm  

Matty_HullFC wrote:

There isn't exactly much more choice though is there?

Who else could have being on the bench against Saints?

Moa, Hall, Broughton, Hodgson

Hardly game changes either are they.

That bench would have been better!

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:01 pm  

The Hollywood Frasier wrote:

I dont think he will in all honesty, the fact he i would assume wanted Radford to get a new deal was a shocking decision. It would be different if we needed to release players to get under the salary cap but we dont. From our current squad i can only see Tony and Moa not been here next season.

There could 6/7 coming in so we will have to get rid of a few. Everyone has an opinion about who they would like to see go so Agar's choices won't be fine with all fans but he will be getting shut of players, I am certain of it.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:02 pm  

Standee wrote:

That bench would have been better!

How so?

Broughton/Hall would have been brought on to play where? Hodgson is unproven as yet and is really a hooker.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:04 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

How so?

Broughton/Hall would have been brought on to play where? Hodgson is unproven as yet and is really a hooker.

With 2mins left......

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:05 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

With 2mins left......

Exactly!

Hall at Centre, Whitihg to 13 and try something new!

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:06 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

There could 6/7 coming in so we will have to get rid of a few. Everyone has an opinion about who they would like to see go so Agar's choices won't be fine with all fans but he will be getting shut of players, I am certain of it.

I'm not so sure that Agar is going to have the BIG clearout that we all want. A lot of the OOC players are probably some of the samller earners at the club and the obvious dross that takes up a large chunk of the cap is already contracted for next season.

I have my fingers crossed for a wholesale clearout but aren't going to hold my breath.

Radford, Cusack, Dowes, King, Thorman, Lee, Tony, G Horne can all go for me and anything less than 7 or 8 players leaving will not be nearly enough.

[Kosh]

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:07 pm  

Matty_HullFC wrote:

There isn't exactly much more choice though is there?

Who else could have being on the bench against Saints?

Moa, Hall, Broughton, Hodgson

Hardly game changes either are they.

What part of spelling players to avoid exhaustion are you and Agar having difficulty with?

Very few forwards can operate at anything like 100% for 80 minutes. We had players on the pitch who were absolutely bolloxed towards the end of Friday's game and fresh guys sat on the bench. That's just poor.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:09 pm  

Standee wrote:

Exactly!

Hall at Centre, Whitihg to 13 and try something new!

Should have been the starting line up mate.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:11 pm  

Kosh wrote:

What part of spelling players to avoid exhaustion are you and Agar having difficulty with?

Very few forwards can operate at anything like 100% for 80 minutes. We had players on the pitch who were absolutely bolloxed towards the end of Friday's game and fresh guys sat on the bench. That's just poor.

Prime example being Dowes...he needs a week off if you ask me.....also did anyone notice after Sts last try and 5 mins left he brought Dowes back on...why??????

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:12 pm  

thehullwhitestar wrote:

Radford, Cusack, Dowes, King, Thorman, Lee, Tony, G Horne can all go for me and anything less than 7 or 8 players leaving will not be nearly enough.

Yeah I wouldn't be unhappy to see that lot depart.