: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:53 am  

carl_spackler wrote:

Can play in either row though.

Either way, my point is that many pointed at him as being a replacement for Crocker. The club seeing him as a prop is further suggestion that this is not the case.

Very positive thinking!

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:53 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

I would much rather see him at prop tbh.

I'd be surprised if many Hull fans wouldn't.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:07 pm  

carl_spackler wrote:

I'd be surprised if many Hull fans wouldn't.

Not really, most Warriors fans feel he is at his most devastating as a wide running 2nd row with a wicked off load.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:09 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Just as believable (or not) as any other rumour on here TBH.

I agree..I was been a tad sarcastic

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:10 pm  

major black wrote:

Not really, most Warriors fans feel he is at his most devastating as a wide running 2nd row with a wicked off load.

Different game though means he would probably be suited to playing prop in SL. Either that or we have a bench of Thacks, Moa, Lauki and Manu. 2 props and 2 2nd rowers!

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:11 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

Nah cannot be right it was posted earlier that the board had said at Bradford they where not optimistic

I just want it all to end..this is worse than waiting to go in labour

and the season runs for 9 months

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:12 pm  

fredie wrote:

and the season runs for 9 months

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:13 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

Different game though means he would probably be suited to playing prop in SL. Either that or we have a bench of Thacks, Moa, Lauki and Manu. 2 props and 2 2nd rowers!

I would like to see the bench something like this,
Thacks, Luauki, Manu and then another from Whiting, Houghton, Lee. Hoping Washy gets a starting spot aswell.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:26 pm  

Am I right in thinking that Australia is ten hours infront of us so each day if we haven't heard anything by mid morning it's v unlikely that we will hear anything that day with it being 10pm over there?

I really am getting fed up of checking the web sites now waiting for some news!

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:29 pm  

Chris1953 wrote: Am I right in thinking that Australia is ten hours infront of us so each day if we haven't heard anything by mid morning it's v unlikely that we will hear anything that day with it being 10pm over there? I really am getting fed up of checking the web sites now waiting for some news! Use this one mate it does it all for ya and updates every 5-10 minutes http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Rugby+League

Chris1953 wrote: Am I right in thinking that Australia is ten hours infront of us so each day if we haven't heard anything by mid morning it's v unlikely that we will hear anything that day with it being 10pm over there? I really am getting fed up of checking the web sites now waiting for some news! Use this one mate it does it all for ya and updates every 5-10 minutes http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Rugby+League