They do have a right to their opinion... however, that doesn't include a right to a view or a right to object about a house price reduction or rise! These are material considerations are not valid opinions... even if that is their opinion!

Also, you don know that bit is not disputed and the SoS office is not disputing those elements of the scheme don't you?

You never said you were against the proposals no, but it's not difficult to read between the lines is it??

Do you have a nice view out of your window currently?

Enjoy it while you can because if the PI goes the way you wish then perhaps you'll just get to look at HGV's.

to me this smacks of a final attempt from the club to fleece a bit more money from its supporters before they drift off into the sunset,if and its a big if the 500k is raised and then the club doesnt get a franchise the shares become almost worthless and i guess the club would go into administration after a struggle.

if it was my club i would find a way to raise the 1k needed to do my bit but it would be in blind faith so i understand those that will empty their pockets for the club.

a question id be wanting to know would be if the club has got its self into this position despite selling its assets and reducing the wage bill no end how can it afford to continue and continue has a viable business,imo it cant.

the rfl can see this and will also use this as a valid reason for saying wtw cannot function has a full time club.it all looks to be coming to a sorry end and i hope you find investment from somewhere but nobody would invest in something thats going out of business when it can be bought for next to nothing in the near future.

its all very sad tbh

You quoted so called 'facts' earlier why are they now an alternate opinion??

When asked to back up your facts you completely avoid the subject by spewing even more bile. Many of these 'facts' have been posted by other personalities in the past, funny how 'rugbyball and falmouth???' were both not apparently affiliated to any club, one I believe was a Liverpool fan and you are a Leeds United fan. So why do you care what happens to any of us egg chaser clubs????

You appear from nowhere on a self proclaimed righteous crusade to fight for the supporters of Wakefield against the evil duo of TRB & IA. You obviously have so much dirt you can spill about the pair of them and how one or both have led us up the garden path, please share with us less worthy mere mortals.

The fact is if you had a thought go through your head, it would be the fastest trip in the world. What you probably think you know could be written on the back of a postage stamp in white emulsion using a 6 inch brush.

Makes me laugh when the objectors say they dont want HGV`s going down Newmarket lane when only a bit further on from the pit site theres a HGV companys yard!. Strange that.

Give him chance -- he needs to get his opinions/facts from "certain people"

Personally i think he talks to fairies at the bottom of his garden.

Don't start slagging the fairies, we're in enough $hite without getting in cas' like bother aswell!!

Leeds is rumoured to be £2m + not sure about yours, but suspect it is larger than a £1m as it dates back to early in the new century and your glory days!

Leeds are taking this one on because of a potential legal discrimination issue that HMRC may have fallen in to! HMRC have done a deal with the RU (on-mass) and RL want the same deal (of 15% and it would reduce the bill significantly) but the HMRC are saying that RL players don't have an 'image' like football or RU players (sounds like a London based assessment) so all image payments in RL where illegal! Leeds have an excellent and strong case that they are taking to a test case at the High Court as they own an RU and an RL club! First, how is it legal for HMRC to tax the same business differently, you want less tax here but more tax there and yet these blokes do almost the same job for the company... play Rugby! Second, we can prove that our RL players have a significantly more prominent 'image' in our primary location of operation... Leeds and the whole of the surrounding area! So your argument is is fact a load of balls (which we all of course know it is!) anyway!

Charlies gone all quiet! I think he's realised he's been rumbled!!
More fizzy wine than champagne!!!!

Cheers IA. Seems to be a solid case that Leeds have. When's it due to be heard?

Careful

If Leeds and their QC don't pull this legal challenge in the high court off then the whole of SL is is up crap creek and we could see a whole raft of clubs going bankrupt and doing a phoenix job... I would think Cas would be on that list!

Also Saints are £8m in debt and seven figure tax bill could hit them hard and given Leeds are going to spend £10m on the new South Stand, it might end up being more 'basic' if they have to fork out £2m to the tax man... who will not wait for his money!

Hes popped his cork prematurely.

Probably something to do with spending all that time with the fairies!!!!!!!!!!