[Wildthing]

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 5:39 am  

Match highlights here; http://www.skysports.com/rugby-league/l ... ield/46368 That really was a game of 3 halves!

Match highlights here; http://www.skysports.com/rugby-league/l ... ield/46368 That really was a game of 3 halves!

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 7:12 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

Rose tined or not , still my actual opinion from what I actually wa
tched
And I was actually a lot closer than they were for many of the incidents

Not all of the incidents' then, maybe you'd taken your mouth for a sheeite or maybe you were too busy counting the number of Wakey fans to see everything, get over yourself and stop embarrassing the decent Leigh fans

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 7:25 am  

Eastern Wildcat wrote:

Apologies to all.

I am just passionate and care.

Were doing well, just got a bit frustrated by the way we lost against Huddersfield and Warrington, and thinking where we could have been.

We are all passionate and care so please don't think that you have a monopoly here, try working on the basis that if I've nothing good to say I'll keep my gob shut and not be negative and get my 2 penneth of criticism in under the guise of an opinion.
You could also add Hull and Wigan as could have/should have won, conversely you could also say we could have/should have lost to Saints, Leigh, and Salford, frustration is part and parcel of being a Wakefield fan you should know that now.

[PopTart]

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 7:36 am  

I know it wasn't great to see a lead like that clawed back but I don't see it as switching off or lack of effort. I'm pretty sure our guys would have preferred a 0-60 final result.

It's simply the ebb and flow of the game and how you handle it.

We started well. They gradually fixed some issues and plated better. We learned how to handle it and played better than they did.

It could easily have been try for try through to 26-26 and then we pull away. No one would have said lack of effort then but it's the same number of tries scored and the same plays.

I'm glad we handled their best and beat them convincingly. That is what happened.

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 7:39 am  

Sacred Cow wrote:

I told you Leigh were poor, any half decent side would have beaten us. .

Isn't this the line tripped out week after week, season after season, by beaten opposion coaches?

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 8:12 am  

And the less said about Dolly Parton the better If that's the best tribute act in Leigh, Jesus. Well done lads, great 2 points But please think about my Heart and nerves in the future.

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 8:28 am  

Seeing as attendance as been mentioned, I hope if, and I say if, we get a shiny new stadium we get more bums on seats than what was there yesterday

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 8:36 am  

PopTart wrote:

I know it wasn't great to see a lead like that clawed back but I don't see it as switching off or lack of effort. I'm pretty sure our guys would have preferred a 0-60 final result.

It's simply the ebb and flow of the game and how you handle it.

We started well. They gradually fixed some issues and plated better. We learned how to handle it and played better than they did.

It could easily have been try for try through to 26-26 and then we pull away. No one would have said lack of effort then but it's the same number of tries scored and the same plays.

I'm glad we handled their best and beat them convincingly. That is what happened.

An accurate summing up, in my opinion. So much goes with possession. Repeat sets (either through good kicks, penalties, or errors) are a killer. We (Leigh) rarely create those repeat sets and therefore don't mount serious pressure the way you have done in our two meetings.

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 8:40 am  

kinleycat wrote:

Three head injuries/concussion assessments in one game.
Says it all.

If I may join in the furore about concussion assessments - we also had a concussion assessment yesterday. We had three at Saints last week, and a fourth player missing yesterday because of a facial injury sustained at Saints. We had 3, or 4 concussion assessments at Salford on Good Friday. (they had a couple too) Are Saints and Salford as 'dirty as us? On the basis of assessments, yes - but I wouldn't dream of suggesting they are 'dirty'.

FWIW, I think Tony Smith has summed it up well. He reckons that the collision nature of our Sport is becoming too high risk, and that something has to be done to reduce that risk. I don't think relegating Leigh (Smith's comments were LAST season when we weren't in SL) or Saints and Salford ( ) will solve the problem!

Re: Leigh away : Sun May 07, 2017 9:04 am  

Would they happen to be French trenches Vasty. If so we may be ok.

I dont have the monopoly and dont claim to. I know a few fans get frustrated amd enjoyment at the same time with us.

My main point was if we could cut this out or reduce it we would be in an even better position. The league is getting tighter season on season and at some point this could go against us.

At the end of the day though, this is a fans forum to air views ans debate them and we all have a right to speak and have an opinion and especially for those like me who pay a lot of money each year for a season ticket

We won, and in the end comfortably. Lets move on to Dewsbury and MW.