Chelsea surely? It's been Abramovich's wish for years now, ever since he got rid of Mourinho?
Jose left in 2007. Guardiola didn't even take over in charge of Barca's first team until the 2008/09 season.
I am against Guardiola because I think the PL is far less forgiving to the football that Guardiola's teams play than Spain is. I'd far prefer a return for Jose. But if we don't have someone substantial lined up for the end of the season then Roman's decision to dispense with Di Matteo is even more stupid than it appeared.
I see Brenda has come out and blindly supported Suarez again. Whilst I'm not really that bothered about this particular example of him lacking morality, as there are plenty of other players would have done the same, is there a line at Liverpool that Suarez would need to cross before they would criticise him?
Horror tackles - Blindly supported, despite criticism from former greats Diving - Blindly supported, despite condemnation from pretty much everyone else Deliberate cheating - Blindly supported, the excuse being it's the referee's job to stop him cheating rather than his responsibility to not do it in the first place Racism - Blindly supported, despite him being clearly guilty and being widely vilified for it, the t-shirt idea was simply horrific and an embarrassment to everything the club once was
How far could it go before Liverpool took a stance other than supporting him, as if he was an angel?
Another clueless post. Drivel, drivel, drivel.
What are these horror tackles you talk of? You have Fellaini in your side so you cant really say much.
Yes his diving has been condonmed by everyone else, even your manager has had a dig,.only to look like a fool when his captain threw himself on the floor days before his comments.
You have a very short memory. Try the derby in 2007 (?) Phil Neville punches the ball off the line in the final whistle and guess what, the ball wasnt coming at him from 2 yards away either. Therefore, Phil Neville, by Saddened's reckening, is a cheat.
I see Brenda has come out and blindly supported Suarez again. Whilst I'm not really that bothered about this particular example of him lacking morality, as there are plenty of other players would have done the same, is there a line at Liverpool that Suarez would need to cross before they would criticise him?
Horror tackles - Blindly supported, despite criticism from former greats Diving - Blindly supported, despite condemnation from pretty much everyone else Deliberate cheating - Blindly supported, the excuse being it's the referee's job to stop him cheating rather than his responsibility to not do it in the first place Racism - Blindly supported, despite him being clearly guilty and being widely vilified for it, the t-shirt idea was simply horrific and an embarrassment to everything the club once was
How far could it go before Liverpool took a stance other than supporting him, as if he was an angel?
That's the thing though, if Nev did those things, he'd get a public toasting from Moyes. He had a go at Neville for his dive, Neville owned up to that as well. Moyes also publicly criticised Marouane Fellaini, who is as important to Everton as Suarez is to Liverpool, for his antics at Stoke. Players make mistakes, they do things wrong all the time. It's how you deal with the issues that shows what kind of person you are. Suarez wouldn't have anything like the heat on him if he, and the club, came out and owned up to it occasionally.
The Blues were magnificent again tonight, did you watch it?
They are 9 points clear in the Bundesliga, Germany isn't among the highest payers in world football, they only appointed their manager in 2011.
I'd say Chelsea, Citeh, PSG and even a return to Barca are far more likely than Munich.
Heynckes may not have been there that long, but he's old and always felt like a stop-gap appointment.
Why Bayern? Big club, stable, opportunity to build something there, likely to get time to put systems and structures into place (such that it's required) - things that aren't necessarily the case at three of the clubs you mention.
Indeed, as it's put in today's Rumour Mill on the Guardian website re PSG wanting him, it's a question of whether he "agrees to transfer his knowledge of managing an ideologically-driven self-funding regional superpower club to splurging vast sums on a hurled-together team of pre-packaged footballing mercenaries"
Last edited by John_D on Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
That's the thing though, if Nev did those things, he'd get a public toasting from Moyes. He had a go at Neville for his dive, Neville owned up to that as well. Moyes also publicly criticised Marouane Fellaini, who is as important to Everton as Suarez is to Liverpool, for his antics at Stoke. Players make mistakes, they do things wrong all the time. It's how you deal with the issues that shows what kind of person you are. Suarez wouldn't have anything like the heat on him if he, and the club, came out and owned up to it occasionally.
The Blues were magnificent again tonight, did you watch it?
Agreed, Moyes and Everton have been brilliant with this really, they seem to realise when a player crosses the line. Unlike some.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...