Adamjk wrote:
How is it fact, Conroy? They're college quarterbacks. Face it, no-one can be certain how they'l transition over into the NFL. You can quote every stat about his 'best season for a junior QB ever' or whatever it was, it doesn't mean he'll translate into a better NFL QB.
Of course you can quote where i have said he'll be a better
NFL QB can't you?
Clausen performed far better this year than Bradford with an inferior team in a much more NFL ready offence. He is the better
prospect by miles, something which i have emphasised. If you bring them both in and think they BOTH could fullfil their potential then you should take the better player ie Clausen. If you bring both in and think Bradford will be better and Clausen won't pan out then obviously you take Bradford.
Based on now, since none of us can tell the future i would take Clausen. I said all this when we discussed Suh. If you think Suh will pan out well and neither of the QB's will then it is the perfect decision to take Suh despite needing a QB more.
The fact is i've never claimed he'll be a better QB in the NFL. He could bust and so could Bradford or vice versa. He is a better QB NOW and a better prospect considering he's just had the best junior season of ANY QB EVER.
Adamjk wrote:
I'm also not sure about Notre Dame being the most hated college team in America. They're massively overrated almost every year, the media darlings and are shown frequently on television throughout the year off the back of nostalgia despite being utterly shite in recent years.
They are hated, but are on TV because they are a historic team.
The media darlings are USC. Put Clausen in a USC shirt and he is the consensus best QB and #1 overall without any doubt.
