Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:01 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

:BOOHOO:

Suarez was found guilty of using racial language numerous times. Video evidence supported Evra's statements, it didn't support Suarez's.

Suarez was found guilty and banned for 9 (?) matches. You had a right of appeal. You choose not to use it. You whined about how you'd been stitched up.

Even when Suarez said he'd shake Evra's hand and then didn't you still came up with excuses for him.

Same old scousers, always the victims. Another minute's silence for you.

Victim? I'm chuffed. Next time I see a black lad in work, I'm gonna call him a f*cking black c*nt, then, when they try to sack/discipline me, I'll just play the sarcasm card. I can't wait, it's my new secret weapon.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:21 pm  

So you're admitting you have racist tendencies, and feel that you'll be able to use that moronic argument as a way of not being sacked when your company send you packing (without any treatment for your broken nose)?

It doesn't surprise me, after seeing what a c*** you are on here.

Let us know how you get on.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:43 pm  

At least JT had to say in court "LFC fans sing a song about my mum". Class.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:49 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

So you're admitting you have racist tendencies, and feel that you'll be able to use that moronic argument as a way of not being sacked when your company send you packing (without any treatment for your broken nose)?

It doesn't surprise me, after seeing what a c*** you are on here.

Let us know how you get on.

Nah, I don't have any tendencies I'm just very sarcastic, especially in response to people calling my mum a slag.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:12 pm  

This is quality. Keep it up, 'bout 6 weeks til the season yet

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:54 am  

Roddy B wrote:

Nah, I don't have any tendencies I'm just very sarcastic, especially in response to people calling my mum a slag.

Well I guess that's better than the murderous tendencies a lot of you scouse filth have.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:50 am  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

Well I guess that's better than the murderous tendencies a lot of you scouse filth have.

Pot kettle black. Booing through a minutes silence for the 96 who died at Hillsborough. Like I said, plastic flags, plastic club.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:54 am  

John_D wrote:

He's still guilty of being John Terry

The most heinous crime committable.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:22 pm  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

Pot kettle black. Booing through a minutes silence for the 96 who died at Hillsborough. Like I said, plastic flags, plastic club.

At least we're not murderers.

Or racists.

You're guilty on both those counts.

Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:46 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

What Suarez was accused of still breaks the law.

If Suarez's case had gone to court he would have been found not guilty because of the beyond reasonable doubt line of enquiry.

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

Suarez's ban was because he was found guilty of multiple counts.

The action was taken against Suarez because the victim complained directly towards the FA and wanted them to pursue the matter.

Action was taken against Terry because one person, an off duty police officer who claims to have watched the clip on TV, complained. Nobody else heard the comments. Not the supposed victim, none of his team mates, none of Terry's team mates, none of the crowd, not the referee.

Scousers will still claim to be the victims in this, like they always do. But no one else should buy into their nonsense.

I agree that the way the issues have been brought to the FA's attention are different, however that doesn't validate one over the other because an offence has taken place in both instances. Terry has less of a defence because he's been resident here for over thirty years. So whilst I take your point about multiple use, Terry's defence appears less strong than Suarez. There is an argument to say that he should receive both less and the same penalty. Whatever decision is reached you'll have one set of fans arguing about it because they will refuse to see both sides of the story and those neutrals without objectivity will end up accusing the FA of favouritism even if they make a good decision.