Re: Football Manager 2010 : Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Saddened! wrote:
I'm on the up with Arsenal. Finished 3rd after taking over in 19th or so. Won the league the following season, then dropped to 6th after a horror season, finishing with just 3 defenders at the club. On course to win the league now though and in the final of the UEFA cup against Spurs.
Talking of Spurs I haven't beaten them once. Is it possible?
But I've spent the past 4 months under a transfer embargo, being told almost daily that I will be replaced by some Portugese manager once the consortium takes over the club. Unbelievable.
One thing I hope they tighten up on FM is the use of delayed payments and the resulting financial meltdown. If you go on the FM forums everyone's squads, right from the first season or two are filled with megastar names. They've sold a few then bought loads of players with little up front and then ridiculous fees over the next few seasons. The game allows you to do this and you can make virtually unlimited signings using it. For example if you have £10m, you can buy 4 players for £2.5m up front, then £10m over 2 years. So a club with a budget of £10m can spend £40m on players. All the people playing it just exploit it to almost instantly assemble ridiculous squads. It's all "I'm Everton and first season I bought Akinfeev, Jovetic, Pjanic, Van Der Vaart, Hazard, Renato and Welliton. I sold Tony Hibbert and Phil Neville".
But what happens on the game is that the club then loses tens of millions per season, the chairman keeps injecting money to 'help with running costs' and when it gets absolutely stupid in terms of loses and debts the club ALWAYS gets taken over. You then get the debt written off and another large wedge of transfer money to spend.
What should happen is the club gets into a mess, points docked, players leaving etc. You should be punished for financial stupidity on the game. Finances are a mess on the game. At Arsenal I've got a net transfer spend of £102m in over 4 seasons (I'm tight) and always a couple of hundred thousand inside the wage budget, yet the club loses £60-70m per season.
Talking of Spurs I haven't beaten them once. Is it possible?
But I've spent the past 4 months under a transfer embargo, being told almost daily that I will be replaced by some Portugese manager once the consortium takes over the club. Unbelievable.
One thing I hope they tighten up on FM is the use of delayed payments and the resulting financial meltdown. If you go on the FM forums everyone's squads, right from the first season or two are filled with megastar names. They've sold a few then bought loads of players with little up front and then ridiculous fees over the next few seasons. The game allows you to do this and you can make virtually unlimited signings using it. For example if you have £10m, you can buy 4 players for £2.5m up front, then £10m over 2 years. So a club with a budget of £10m can spend £40m on players. All the people playing it just exploit it to almost instantly assemble ridiculous squads. It's all "I'm Everton and first season I bought Akinfeev, Jovetic, Pjanic, Van Der Vaart, Hazard, Renato and Welliton. I sold Tony Hibbert and Phil Neville".
But what happens on the game is that the club then loses tens of millions per season, the chairman keeps injecting money to 'help with running costs' and when it gets absolutely stupid in terms of loses and debts the club ALWAYS gets taken over. You then get the debt written off and another large wedge of transfer money to spend.
What should happen is the club gets into a mess, points docked, players leaving etc. You should be punished for financial stupidity on the game. Finances are a mess on the game. At Arsenal I've got a net transfer spend of £102m in over 4 seasons (I'm tight) and always a couple of hundred thousand inside the wage budget, yet the club loses £60-70m per season.
I think one of the reasons that the finances are the way they are, is because probably the best part of the game is signing players. I know that when i have very little to spend and can't sign anyone, i get pretty bored quite quick. TBH, i take full advantage of the way the finances are, and i do sign a lot of players, as you have probably noticed. Although, i do agree with what you are saying. I think they should tighten up on this, as it is a bit far fetched and it is very easy to build a quality quad and pretty quickly too.