In the last week some div, probably that Winkledick, slagged off Chelsea and said that even with Abramovich's investment Man United had performed far better in the CL.
This has been Chelsea's CL record since Roman bought Chelsea:
Bearing in mind that when the final United won, was won against us on penalties, that we've been up against epic battles with Barca (with usually 10 men) and Liverpool, while Barca have usually ass-raped them and they never faced the vermin, I'd say that the difference is paper thin right now, and if we actually beat Bayern (rather than winning through pens) then we'd be ahead of them.
Spot on. Making two finals in nine years is great. Just for the record, we beat Barca over two legs in 2008. 1-0 on aggregate. We beat you in a final and put you out last season, which means we're unbeaten against you in the comp, which would naturally give us the edge. Also we have made one more final. In a nutshell, you're massively clutching at straws.
Last edited by Mark on Mon May 07, 2012 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Spot on. Making two finals in nine years is great. Just for the record, we beat Barca over two legs in 2008. 1-0 on aggregate. We beat you in a final and put you out last season, which means we're unbeaten against you in the comp, which would naturally give us the edge. Also we have made one more final. In a nutshell, you're massively clutching at straws.
and battered Arsenal who at the time were being held as something like the blueprint for Barcelona / Brazil 1970 / Holland 1974 by their fawning media
Last edited by flipper on Mon May 07, 2012 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In the last week some div, probably that Winkledick, slagged off Chelsea and said that even with Abramovich's investment Man United had performed far better in the CL.
This has been Chelsea's CL record since Roman bought Chelsea:
Bearing in mind that when the final United won, was won against us on penalties, that we've been up against epic battles with Barca (with usually 10 men) and Liverpool, while Barca have usually ass-raped them and they never faced the vermin, I'd say that the difference is paper thin right now, and if we actually beat Bayern (rather than winning through pens) then we'd be ahead of them.
United have made more finals and have won the tournament more during the time period in question. So I don't see how it can be twisted that chelsea have done better in the Champions league.
You're good at coming out with bizzarre arguments though, due to your mantra that everything chelsea/mourinho is awesome and everything liverpool/everyone else is sh*t.
Of course you don't say that, but that's the general direction your posts take. Just like the one above.
You'll be claiming chelsea have a better record than barca next.
Terrible, ugly scenes at ewood park, blackburn relegated and steve keane running down the tunnel for his own safety.
Well, I know the Blackburn females aren't the prettiest, but surely there was no need for Steve to leg it like that. They may not be Susanna Reid, but.....
United have made more finals and have won the tournament more during the time period in question. So I don't see how it can be twisted that chelsea have done better in the Champions league.
You're good at coming out with bizzarre arguments though, due to your mantra that everything chelsea/mourinho is awesome and everything liverpool/everyone else is sh*t.
Of course you don't say that, but that's the general direction your posts take. Just like the one above.
You'll be claiming chelsea have a better record than barca next.
I just went back and had a look at your original comment. I remembered it as you having a dig as though United had a far superior CL record, but reading it back it was nothing like I remembered. I wish I had gone back and read your post before making mine, I'd have saved myself a .