Re: rl : Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:56 pm  

DaveO wrote:

And most people who decide to go and live in Oz stay there, so you two are the ones talking nonsense.

Do they? Post the link with the proof of that FACT Dave.

Re: rl : Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:52 am  

DaveO wrote:

And most people who decide to go and live in Oz stay there, so you two are the ones talking nonsense.

Dave

not really dave, iv met quite afew "poms" over here are heading back home due to homesickness/lack of work.

the figures they give over here say between 40-45% english who emmigrate go back home.

ps a guy i used to work with only lasted 6weeks in brisbane so its not for everybody!!

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:02 am  

Mother Feka wrote:

Because he is crap? No better than what we have.

I would rather play O'Carroll or Prescott than Fozzard. He would not improve us at all imo.

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:33 am  

CAM. wrote:

Fozzard back to Saints, confirmed.

Why weren't we interested?

Because he's 32 and has been Rovers' least effective prop this season (check his stats).

The real question is why were Saints interested?

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:38 am  

Mother Feka wrote:

Because he is crap? No better than what we have.

He's your average superleague prop that does a steady job much in the same way that Coley does.

We need something totally different.

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:13 am  

CAM. wrote: Fozzard back to Saints, confirmed. Why weren't we interested? Maybe because he's ranged from gash to poor this year. Over the moon if he goes back to Saints. http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/09/09/21/RUGBYL_St_Helens.html St Helens picking up Hull KR rejects

CAM. wrote: Fozzard back to Saints, confirmed. Why weren't we interested? Maybe because he's ranged from gash to poor this year. Over the moon if he goes back to Saints. http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/09/09/21/RUGBYL_St_Helens.html St Helens picking up Hull KR rejects

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:49 am  

Cruncher wrote:

Because he's 32 and has been Rovers' least effective prop this season (check his stats).

The real question is why were Saints interested?

If rumours are to be believed they are broke. Apparently their next signing announcement is Gareth Haggerty.

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:55 am  

100% Warrior wrote:

If rumours are to be believed they are broke. Apparently their next signing announcement is Gareth Haggerty.

Funny you should say that, but a Saints fan told me the same (being skint) a couple of weeks ago. At the time I just thought it was an excuse, but who knows

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:01 pm  

Catalancs wrote:

Funny you should say that, but a Saints fan told me the same (being skint) a couple of weeks ago. At the time I just thought it was an excuse, but who knows

They will have a good chunk of wage after releasing Cayless...i fully expect them to announce a top signing also

: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:05 pm  

wigan_knight wrote:

They will have a good chunk of wage after releasing Cayless...i fully expect them to announce a top signing also

You think he was on a big wage?
If they have a 'good chunk of wage' free why are they signing Fozzard?