Re: rl : Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:38 am  

Father Ted wrote:

If Mathers, or any other player, went out on loan why do we allow them to play against us?
In soccer they don't play against the club that has loaned them out so why do we do it in RL?
Are there rules in force that prevent this embargo?

Are you saying you wouldnt want mathers to play against us?

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:44 am  

We dont need him, let him go, and can we send Coley up there aswell?

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:58 am  

I don't think he should play against us. I he scored the winning try for example we'd give the guy even more stick!

Let him go for mine, he really hasn't shown anything for us, apart from being the dirtiest player we've ever had cards wise!

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:01 am  

Hogan Keeeeeench wrote:

We dont need him, let him go, and can we send Coley up there aswell?

Two for the price of one maybe?

I will drive both of them there and buy them some dinner out of me own pocket

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:01 am  

Can we pay them to take him?

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:03 am  

When there's talk of players going out on loan, I always wonder if it means another player might be coming in.

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:26 am  

Cruncher wrote:

When there's talk of players going out on loan, I always wonder if it means another player might be coming in.

Yes, i remember this being mentioned, you may want to add Phelps to this list also.

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:33 am  

Personally if I was Hull I would take Phelps rather than Mathers to cover FB.

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:34 am  

I would chip in a bit of money to get rid of mathers

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:35 am  

- Neil - wrote:

Personally if I was Hull I would take Phelps rather than Mathers to cover FB.

shush don't give them any ideas