Re: Rumours and signings v9 : Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:31 pm
Jukesays wrote:
What about players we've already brought in and/or resigned on new improved contracts?
Do you not think that the club may have already allocated the players leaving/loaned salaries to retain and/or bring those in?
I'm not saying we won't bring anyone in, I'm not saying we should or shouldn't, but simply saying players have left/retired so we must have money is far too overly simple.
Most of those decisions would have been made 4/5/6 months ago (I knew Flower was going around Beginning of OCT so it must have been planned way before then for example) and as such plans on who we could bring in or increase wages for retained players (Remember the likes of Havard resigning on improved deals) would have been made far earlier than anyone imagines or gives credit to the club for.
I'll say it again - the vast majority of what is possible will already have happened, Burgess wages and what we could do with them under the cap will have been factored in 3-4 months ago
Do you not think that the club may have already allocated the players leaving/loaned salaries to retain and/or bring those in?
I'm not saying we won't bring anyone in, I'm not saying we should or shouldn't, but simply saying players have left/retired so we must have money is far too overly simple.
Most of those decisions would have been made 4/5/6 months ago (I knew Flower was going around Beginning of OCT so it must have been planned way before then for example) and as such plans on who we could bring in or increase wages for retained players (Remember the likes of Havard resigning on improved deals) would have been made far earlier than anyone imagines or gives credit to the club for.
I'll say it again - the vast majority of what is possible will already have happened, Burgess wages and what we could do with them under the cap will have been factored in 3-4 months ago
Panicked when I saw mention of Havard resigning then, that missing hyphen is important!