Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:42 am  

CobraCraig wrote:

I thought Wardle was a bit late and over zealous but a ban would be harsh, the other penalties where very harsh imo, the tackles where just after the ball had gone.

The Ellis one was a shocking decision.

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:42 am  

NSW wrote:

Still about 4 weeks off I think

shame, as would have made a good story, but so would Astley

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:46 am  

Fantastic Mr Catpiss wrote:

it might be a small sample size, but if we say 4 games, a quarter of those he was good, and three quarters he was bloody terrible(see the first game with fans in v huddersfield in 2021 when kenny edwards tore him a new butt hole) i'd say that was a fairly good indicator, even on a small sample size.

*pew pew*

A little more on this. King has played 2 games on the wing for us. Solid in the 1st and excellent in the 2nd. Using our "small sample" method, he's now a winger!

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:03 am  

Phuzzy wrote:

A little more on this. King has played 2 games on the wing for us. Solid in the 1st and excellent in the 2nd. Using our "small sample" method, he's now a winger!

*pew pew*

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:30 am  

CobraCraig wrote:

I thought Wardle was a bit late and over zealous but a ban would be harsh, the other penalties where very harsh imo, the tackles where just after the ball had gone.

There was no deliberate foul such as a shoulder charge, or hitting the player blind. Yes it was late but at the speed these people play at we are talking about fractions of a second. A fine will suffice.

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:35 am  

Front on, arms spread, contact chest to chest, 5 matches

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:53 am  

apollosghost wrote:

Front on, arms spread, contact chest to chest, 5 matches

He doesn't play for Saints, we'll be fine.

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:57 am  

Zig wrote:

There was no deliberate foul such as a shoulder charge, or hitting the player blind. Yes it was late but at the speed these people play at we are talking about fractions of a second. A fine will suffice.

The slow motion replays do my nut in. People saying they’re late when they watch them seem to ignore the fact that it wasn’t the speed it actually happened at. I think he’ll get a ban simply based on O’Brien being hurt in the incident but there wasn’t much in any of them.

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:02 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

The slow motion replays do my nut in. People saying they’re late when they watch them seem to ignore the fact that it wasn’t the speed it actually happened at. I think he’ll get a ban simply based on O’Brien being hurt in the incident but there wasn’t much in any of them.

If I was Wigan, I'd be showing the Davies late hit on Myler, should a ban be issued. The Wardle and Davies incidents are night and day, and Davies avoided a ban...

Re: Wardle : Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:25 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

The slow motion replays do my nut in.

Absolutely agree and the game is being officiated more and more in slow motion with the VR getting involved after watching something 10x over in super slow mo. It will always look worse that way.