: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:11 pm  

Nathan Cayless could be on his way out of Eels, as his place in the team as been filled by Justin Poore, worth a shot??

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:13 pm  

[Gareth] wrote:

problem with timmy is that, if he plays to his potential, hes a certain SOO and Oz starter

i dont think we have any chance of keeping him

Dont get carried away, i dont think at his full potential he'd get a game in an England shirt. Infront of Lockyer and Thurston or Burrows and Leon. No chance.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:15 pm  

Not forgetting Dobson did the same wanted to go back to Oz to secure a first team spot, to find he wasn't the good enough standard still. Hope with Tim Smith the same doesn't happen. Don't want him to come back to bite us with another SL team as Dobson as.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:18 pm  

Bill_Barlow wrote:

Dont get carried away, i dont think at his full potential he'd get a game in an England shirt. Infront of Lockyer and Thurston or Burrows and Leon. No chance.

wont be around forever

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:26 pm  

Last Son of Wigan wrote:

But yet you expected myself to justify a point thats been over and done with 2 weeks back cos you can't be arsed flickin back through the pages? who the hell do you think you are?

Secondly, do you think Wigan could get Orford for the same price as Long? NO, obviously not.

So how do you expect to have both Orford and Myler under the same CAP? wake up, Myler himself isn't going to be cheap looking at his demand.

Long and Myler-split backs, develop the Myler/Tomkins partnership over 2 years under Longs supervision bring Sam off the bench and often starting.

I can't believe I'm even bothering re-explaining this considering Long has now signed for Hull.

But anytime you wanna have a pop, let me know and I'll happily rip you and your lame arguments to pieces.

I do not want to sign both Orford and Myler, I have never said this, It's you who wants both Long and Myler, I was just asking why you wouldn't want Orford instead as I beleive him to be the better player. That is all. I understand your point and it's not a bad one by any means, the only thing is I was confused because of the whole Orford, Long thing.

Look at it this way, Orford is now a much better option than Long and we should be in for him.

Im not having a pop, I was discussing things with you, something which is quite a good argument, between Long and Orford. You can rip my arguments to pieces if you wish, if it gives you some sort of kick, but like someone else said you have a chip on your shoulder.

My argument is hardly lame as well, however your predictable approach is, me and clearly a few others on here find it laughable.

Just for the record, we are on RLfans not on question time. You don't have to be so defencive about your party.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:29 pm  

Mark1987 wrote:

Nathan Cayless could be on his way out of Eels, as his place in the team as been filled by Justin Poore, worth a shot??

It was in the express yesterday that the Eels would be willing to let him go if he could get a deal in the superleague, personally think he'd be perfect for us.
So there we have it Nathan Cayless and Richie Myler for next year please Mr Lenegan.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:35 pm  

Mark1987 wrote:

Nathan Cayless could be on his way out of Eels, as his place in the team as been filled by Justin Poore, worth a shot??

He would be excelent, I am pretty sure gets plenty game time in as well. He is a captain at the eals so he clealy a leader which is what we need. He is 31 so we could probably maybe offer him 2 years with a 3rd optional. I am certain that IL will have someone in mind, I just wonder if Cayless is one of them.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:39 pm  

odemwingie wrote:

He would be excelent, I am pretty sure gets plenty game time in as well. He is a captain at the eals so he clealy a leader which is what we need. He is 31 so we could probably maybe offer him 2 years with a 3rd optional. I am certain that IL will have someone in mind, I just wonder if Cayless is one of them.

Both of the Cayless's are out of contract, if only

Daniel Anderson made Hindmarsh captain of the Eels That's what I think made him stay with them.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:41 pm  

[Gareth] wrote:

wont be around forever

Correct but then hes got to dislodge the likes of Campese and even the likes of Trent.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:43 pm  

Bill_Barlow wrote:

Correct but then hes got to dislodge the likes of Campese and even the likes of Trent.

very true but like i said, IF he plays to his (full) potential.

he still has a long way to go and i for one would be very happy if his form continued for us beyond this season