: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:07 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

What on earth..

It's all about opinions and 1 day, who knows, you may be right.

Seriously, what has he done that Pryce couldn't? He did set up a nice try at the JJB admittedly but he is a top line, expensive signing and he is simply not performing. FFS our other winger is a teenager just making his mark and he is blowing Roberts away! It should be the other way round, shouldn't it?

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:07 pm  

Meyt N Prater Pie wrote:

I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.

I'd perhaps swap Joel and Locky around. Also not too sure whether it's too early to give up on Riddell yet so I'd go with him. (Micky's discipline worries me and we have got enough badly disciplined players in the side as it is).

[Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy]

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:09 pm  

1 Richards
2 Roberts
3 Bailey
4 Carmont
5 Ainscough
6 S Tomkins
7 Smith
8 Prescott
9 Leuluai
10 Fielden
11 Hansen
12 O'Loughlin
13 J Tomkins

lets have some impact from the bench

14 Hock
15 O'Carroll
16 Feka
17 Riddell

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:10 pm  

Woody_woody wrote:

I'd perhaps swap Joel and Locky around. Also not too sure whether it's too early to give up on Riddell yet so I'd go with him. (Micky's discipline worries me and we have got enough badly disciplined players in the side as it is).

Well I agree regarding Joel and Lockers but didnt bother swapping them, simply because it will never ever happen. As for riddell, he needs slinging in the reserves until hes fully fit. Weve got no time for unfit, fat slugs

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:10 pm  

RB wrote:

Pryce played against Castleford and looked about 60% fit at the most.

So? At 60% he's fitter than both Riddell and Smith.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:11 pm  

Wigan/Leeds Andy wrote:

1 Richards
2 Roberts
3 Bailey
4 Carmont
5 Ainscough
6 S Tomkins
7 Smith
8 Prescott
9 Leuluai
10 Fielden
11 Hansen
12 O'Loughlin
13 J Tomkins

lets have some impact from the bench

14 Hock
15 O'Carroll
16 Feka
17 Riddell

Never an impact player in a million years this mon

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:12 pm  

Meyt N Prater Pie wrote:

I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.

I'd have Riddell and Coley ahead of McIlorum and Prescott for now.

Mark Riddell will be a superb player once if he gets to speed and fitness with Super League. This won't be achieved by playing him in the reserves. Luckily for us, McIlorum has age on his side and will have plenty of opportunities should Riddell continue not to make progress.

When both fully fit, I'd easily have Prescott ahead of Coley but I'm not convinced that Prescott is fully fit yet. Give it a couple of weeks for Prescott to regain fitness and he'd take Coley's place for me.

[Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy]

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:12 pm  

Meyt N Prater Pie wrote:

Never an impact player in a million years this mon

That's why I said "some" impact on the bench.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:12 pm  

I think Riddell deserves a place more than Smith does.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:13 pm  

odemwingie wrote:

I think Riddell deserves a place more than Smith does.

That's called "damning with faint praise", isn't it?