Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:43 pm  

Wadski wrote:

He's defending his himself incase Fielden accidentally connects with someone. Fortunately Fielden had his eyes closed and missed everyone.

Or incase Mason decides to come in from hiding at the back!! Or maybe Lawrence stops trying to tickle Hansen with a cheap shot to the kidneys!!!

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:09 pm  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

at the end of the day this is about a guy who stamped, stood, whatever you want call it on Fielden. Yet not many Gaints fans can get past their bias and admit that its was wrong and he deserves a ban. What this has to do with Lockers I dont know and just shows how baised you are that your trying to justify Mason by your hatred of Lockers. Not an overreaction just simpley saying it how it is. If im biased then it really doesnt say much for you.

Haven't made any comment regarding O'Loughlin at all. Haven't defended Mason's treading on Fielden. So this supposed bias I am displaying highlighted via these comments I haven't made which is you apparently 'saying how it is' are in reality a nice little snippet of your own bias that you apparently do not have!

Like I say, LOLalicious!

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:11 pm  

Ian Roberts Closet wrote:

Or incase Mason decides to come in from hiding at the back!!

He ran straight at Fielden, how much more front on do you want

[Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy]

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:13 pm  

Gahan wrote:

Seasons 2009 and season 2010 to date

Up before the RFL

Mason 10 times (various offences)..........1 £300 fine

O Loughlin 11 times(mainly head high or grapple)......Nothing


Pretty even on appearances, your boy seems very lucky when hes up before em

Neither Mason nor O'Loughlin have been "up before the RFL" that many times. Having an incident reviewed on the Monday morning is not being "up before the the RFL".

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:15 pm  

Wigan/Leeds Andy wrote:

Neither Mason nor O'Loughlin have been "up before the RFL" that many times. Having an incident reviewed on the Monday morning is not being "up before the the RFL".

You got the drift which was my point, couldnt be bothered going thru any charges that did arise.

Surely it making the review is going up before them regardless of further action

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:51 pm  

I actually said at half time when i saw it again on the screen that Mase would be in trouble for that !!

As for saying he hid - wot tosh - Mase ran in, shoved him and then stood right in front of Fielden waiting for his reaction and then they got it on - hardly running away is it ?

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:21 pm  

Griffin will be lucky to escape a ban because he joined in something that didn't involve him, a la McCarthy-Scarsbrook last year. 1-2 matches, although his previous record may not help him. Mason should get at least 2 for the stand-on, more if his previous record is taken into account. I expect Fielden will get one match, but due to the aggravation involved (being stood on and then Griffin getting involved) and previous good record, I won't be surprised if he gets just a fine. Brown was stupid to do that ankle tap in front of the referee. Nothing "malicious" in it, but I thought Professional fouls were supposed to be an instant red?

Griffin will be lucky to escape a ban because he joined in something that didn't involve him, a la McCarthy-Scarsbrook last year. 1-2 matches, although his previous record may not help him. Mason should get at least 2 for the stand-on, more if his previous record is taken into account. I expect Fielden will get one match, but due to the aggravation involved (being stood on and then Griffin getting involved) and previous good record, I won't be surprised if he gets just a fine. Brown was stupid to do that ankle tap in front of the referee. Nothing "malicious" in it, but I thought Professional fouls were supposed to be an instant red?

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:40 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

Brown was stupid to do that ankle tap in front of the referee. Nothing "malicious" in it, but I thought Professional fouls were supposed to be an instant red?

If you watch the footage of the incident from the camera behind the play you see Richards dummy towards Tomkins right before Brown ankle taps him. From the angle Tomkins was running this move is unsighted by Bentham.

It goes someway to explain why it happened.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:27 pm  

Wadski wrote:

If you watch the footage of the incident from the camera behind the play you see Richards dummy towards Tomkins right before Brown ankle taps him. From the angle Tomkins was running this move is unsighted by Bentham.

It goes someway to explain why it happened.

Well, it's understandable, but I'm not sure "I thought he was going to get the ball" would stand up under scrutiny.

Kevin Brown isn't a dirty player, either. In fact, all your ex-Wigan contingent (who combined brilliantly for Robinson's try) learnt their trade well at Wigan, all of them are good, clean, quality players.

I think it would also be fair to say Tansey's in for the roughest ride tomorrow...

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:19 am  

A profeesional foul is a yellow card not a red.

Mason is looking at at least a couple of games. But you talk about his previous record. This is his fourth season at the Giants and the only time i remember him in any trouble was for fighting Peacock in a pre season friendly. He is nothing like as dirty as people are making out.
Griffin should be ok. If he ran in to fight he would be in trouble but he was right next to Fielden when the trouble started. You could easily have cited a couple more players from each side for running in (Riddell can clearly be seen throwing a punch)