: Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:48 pm  

Raaaaymond wrote:

Great to hear the HKR fans getting on the ref's back. Makes a change from us complaining.

Have to say that KCFM 99.8 commentators were very fair in the first half, I thought.

Thank You.
Call it as we see it mate.

Hudds were very strong today and more support then usual travelled over.
Your bench won it.

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:41 pm  

Code13 wrote:

What about the "tackling technique" that saw Fulton off injured?

Webster's tackle was 100% legal, an excellent tackle in fact. It's just unfortunate that Fulton got injured.

Lovegrove's was due to someone grabbing his arm (whilst he was on the floor) and forcing his arm behind his shoulder so badly that it dislocated - must feel great for him - playing for a new contract and some degenerate player dislocates his shoulder - Stop talking childish tit for tat and grow up

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:42 pm  

Oh please...

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:42 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

Webster's tackle was 100% legal, an excellent tackle in fact. It's just unfortunate that Fulton got injured.

Lovegrove's was due to someone grabbing his arm (whilst he was on the floor) and forcing his arm behind his shoulder so badly that it dislocated - must feel great for him - playing for a new contract and some degenerate player dislocates his shoulder - Stop talking childish tit for tat and grow up

I'd move onto the apples. Those grapes have turned.

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:52 pm  

Danril wrote:

Oh please...

Wadski wrote:

I'd move onto the apples. Those grapes have turned.

Nothing to do with the result at all - we were out played and credit to your team.

But you clearly have no compassion for a player whose had his shoulder dislocated through foul play - what a pair of scumbags

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:52 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

Webster's tackle was 100% legal, an excellent tackle in fact. It's just unfortunate that Fulton got injured.

Lovegrove's was due to someone grabbing his arm (whilst he was on the floor) and forcing his arm behind his shoulder so badly that it dislocated - must feel great for him - playing for a new contract and some degenerate player dislocates his shoulder - Stop talking childish tit for tat and grow up

You mean a chicken wing tackle

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:53 pm  

willowred wrote:

You mean a chicken wing tackle

Aye, thats the technical term.

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:00 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

Nothing to do with the result at all - we were out played and credit to your team.

But you clearly have no compassion for a player whose had his shoulder dislocated through foul play - what a pair of scumbags

Excuse me?

Who cheered when Fulton remained down after his injury?

We all know where the scumbags are.

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:01 pm  

Were any Huddersfield fans near the alleged 'chicken wing' tackle? Do you think it was foul play?

: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:01 pm  

Injured players get my sympathy. However I don't take idiots like you at your word. Your one eyed interpretation has been read and given the credence it deserves. ie. none.