: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:05 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

No it isn't

There were other people involved of course but the people who were involved with the club made no difference what so ever in getting the stadium passed by the planners.

That was down to Hoyle and a few of his mates.

So what you originally said was wrong?

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:08 pm  

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote:

So what you originally said was wrong?

No because i was answering Mark M response about the fans getting the ground, i said nobody else, meaning at the club.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:10 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

No because i was answering Mark M response about the fans getting the ground, i said nobody else, meaning at the club.

Who were Hoyle's mates?

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:11 pm  

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote:

Who were Hoyle's mates?

Council and Government mates.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:14 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote: Council and Government mates. "After securing the community Stadium, he left I know Wikipedia isn't the most reliable of sources all the time, but it was the top results of a Google search.

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote: Council and Government mates. "After securing the community Stadium, he left I know Wikipedia isn't the most reliable of sources all the time, but it was the top results of a Google search.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:19 pm  

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote: "After securing the community Stadium, he left I know Wikipedia isn't the most reliable of sources all the time, but it was the top results of a Google search. Wikipedia now's about as much as you do on this subject and by the sounds of it that isn't much.

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote: "After securing the community Stadium, he left I know Wikipedia isn't the most reliable of sources all the time, but it was the top results of a Google search. Wikipedia now's about as much as you do on this subject and by the sounds of it that isn't much.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:45 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

Council and Government mates.

You mean he had so much influence over it the application it went to the risk and lottery of PUBLIC ENQUIRY?

Lord Hoyle steered the process but I guarantee that if the supporters had not shown so much will and demand for the stadium IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PASSED BECAUSE IT WAS AGAINST THE PLANNING LEGISLATION THAT WAS THEN IN PLACE.

If I could find the report I would quote the relevant points verbatim.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:50 pm  

mark_m wrote:

IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PASSED BECAUSE IT WAS AGAINST THE PLANNING LEGISLATION THAT WAS THEN IN PLACE.

I have explained this to you before via PM, check your inbox.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:51 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

I have explained this to you via PM.

That is not an explanation just a far fetched suggestion. You have been watching too much TV.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:51 pm  

I still despair at the vast majority written i our forums, we make ourselves the laughing stock of super league with our reactions not what the club does.

This is still after 3 defeats this year against 3 very good and practically error free teams in their performances against us.

We're one of the best run super league teams with everything that we do. There is a fine line between winning and loosing and we just need to find the difference. People talk about bring in this coach or that coach, it's not as simple as pick a name and give him the job. Looking at our fans, there are probably not alot of coaches that would want the job.

Only one thing needs to change at Warrington and thats the culture that has been here for years. We all know what it is. Even karl Harrison comments on it in todays League weekly.

Don't boo the coach or the players or Moran and don't hope for us to get beat this week as some of you have. People sing wire till I die and then boo certain players or coaches when things don't go our way. The people hat make desicions about playing staff or coaching staff will make changes whether we want it or not and will do it as appropriate. We should be there to support the club through thick or thin and back the people who have to make the descions rather than continually slate them.