: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm  

just_browny wrote:

Stevo spent about 70 minutes saying how awesome Hull were, before finally acknowledging there were two teams on the park. Still refused to give us any credit though.

We should still be beating limited sides like Hull more easily, I feel.

Same, but a wins a win so just relieved we came away with the two points against an injury ravaged Hull.

: Sat May 16, 2009 7:19 pm  

just_browny wrote:

Stevo spent about 70 minutes saying how awesome Hull were, before finally acknowledging there were two teams on the park. Still refused to give us any credit though.

We should still be beating limited sides like Hull more easily, I feel.

I agree. Maybe it's just my opinion on what a 'good hit' is, but that one by King on Landerson I think it was, was nothing special. Yet Stevo and Eddie were like 'cracking hit!' etc.

: Sat May 16, 2009 7:25 pm  

Robbie Rotten wrote:

I agree. Maybe it's just my opinion on what a 'good hit' is, but that one by King on Landerson I think it was, was nothing special. Yet Stevo and Eddie were like 'cracking hit!' etc.

IMO they just get a bit exited with the match

i thourght it was quite a good one aswell

: Sat May 16, 2009 8:54 pm  

Good win, without Hicks, King and Johnson missing from our backline. We coped well enough and got the win.

Well done to Che for sending a rocket up their bottoms, and it was a shame that bad Monaghan turned up, hopefully good Monaghan is back next week.

Higham, Moz and Mather were excellent 2nd half.

Briers' kicking second half was also clinical, forcing a few drop-outs and but them on the backfoot a few times. Very very important in helping us come out with a victory.

: Sat May 16, 2009 9:14 pm  

Great second half performance after a first half of silly pemalties and mistakes.

Thought Morley and Carvell were fantastic.
Mathers improved as the game went on and may prove to be a good signing.
Higham gave us some nice go forward.
Harrison worked incredibly hard.
Was impressed with Clarke (probably get shot on here for saying that)

Monaghan had a stinker
L Anderson tried but made some silly errors, as did Rauhihi
Briers seemed average, never really controlled things.

All in all it was nice to see a Warrington team come out and dominate the second half. Despite being behind the team did seem to have confidence in themselves.

: Sat May 16, 2009 9:31 pm  

The Punisher wrote:

Thought Morley, Higham and Carvell were immense in the 2nd half.

take a bow you .thats what won the game .smith has to micky with them 2

: Sat May 16, 2009 9:37 pm  

good second half to win, but shocking support was this down to the distance /time of day or telly?

: Sat May 16, 2009 10:07 pm  

snowie wrote:

good second half to win, but shocking support was this down to the distance /time of day or telly?

JUST back from game, very poor turnout, what was att?

: Sat May 16, 2009 10:22 pm  

slimwire66 wrote:

JUST back from game, very poor turnout, what was att?

Just under 11,000

10,997 I think.

: Sat May 16, 2009 11:59 pm  

Hicksy wrote:

Don't care were he played.

He was superb.

Just hope he and Micky play as good next week agaisnt there old..

Paul2812 and Hickys in blatent admission of having no grasp on the game what so ever