Captain Hook wrote:
I accept the contact by Currie could have been a penalty, I am less convinced that it was a certain try and therefore a penalty try.
I just think that in any fair challenge for a loose ball, it's highly likely that there is going to be some degree of contact. If Currie had been the attacker in that incident, would the try have been disallowed? Seems like a slippery slope if you are going to punish minor contact like that. But whatever the call about the contact aspect, I agree with you that it didn't look a certain try anyway. If we'd lost the game, I would have been fuming about that call. Actually, I am anyway!
