Wires71 wrote:
You said "Had he not been appointed we would have been in what was then NL 1, and we may not have got back into SL".
No evidence to suggest we would have been relegated without his appointment. And there is no evidence to suggest we would not have got back into SL if we were, indeed, relegated. That is why you are wrong.
However saying "had we have won none from 6, it was bye bye" is correct.
No evidence to suggest we would have been relegated without his appointment. And there is no evidence to suggest we would not have got back into SL if we were, indeed, relegated. That is why you are wrong.
However saying "had we have won none from 6, it was bye bye" is correct.
There never is any evidence for things that never happened