Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:13 pm  

according to RFL site : "initial contact with ball / chest of player"

Fakir charged : Grade C offence : 1 - 4 matches

...... and we all know about Benny, Grade D offence : 3 - 5 matches

If the RFL are consistent (per Richie Mathers Grade D offence) Benny should get 3 matches + £300 fine

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:26 pm  

orford_addict wrote:

according to RFL site : "initial contact with ball / chest of player"

Fakir charged : Grade C offence : 1 - 4 matches

...... and we all know about Benny, Grade D offence : 3 - 5 matches

If the RFL are consistent (per Richie Mathers Grade D offence) Benny should get 3 matches + £300 fine

Wasn't that Mathers first sending off?

I don't think it's Westwoods, and they now take previous into consideration.

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:29 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Wasn't that Mathers first sending off?

I don't think it's Westwoods, and they now take previous into consideration.

well think again, brother

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:34 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Wasn't that Mathers first sending off?

I don't think it's Westwoods, and they now take previous into consideration.

Did he not get sent off for clothes lining King last season?

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:40 pm  

Catnap wrote:

Did he not get sent off for clothes lining King last season?

That was what he was referring to.

I thought the rule was that they didn't take previous into consideration, which came about from Paul Cooke's sending off a few seasons ago, and many people jumping to his defence that he 'isn't that sort of player' and shouldn't be done as heavily as, say, if it were Terry Newton. I stand to be corrected, though.

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:48 pm  

Refering to Fakir RFL Disciplinary wrote: Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law: High tackle Detail: Tried to tackle but restless about the outcome Grade: Grade C http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=747 What does that mean? I'm guessing it's a typo, but I can't work out what it should have said!

Refering to Fakir RFL Disciplinary wrote: Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law: High tackle Detail: Tried to tackle but restless about the outcome Grade: Grade C http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=747 What does that mean? I'm guessing it's a typo, but I can't work out what it should have said!

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:51 pm  

Thelonius wrote: Refering to Fakir http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=747 What does that mean? I'm guessing it's a typo, but I can't work out what it should have said! Tried to tackle but was reckless in doing so?

Thelonius wrote: Refering to Fakir http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=747 What does that mean? I'm guessing it's a typo, but I can't work out what it should have said! Tried to tackle but was reckless in doing so?

Re: Mogg Cleared ..... : Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:10 pm  

'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote:

That was what he was referring to.

I thought the rule was that they didn't take previous into consideration, which came about from Paul Cooke's sending off a few seasons ago, and many people jumping to his defence that he 'isn't that sort of player' and shouldn't be done as heavily as, say, if it were Terry Newton. I stand to be corrected, though.

Ah right my mistake, I was thinking he got sent off against us for trying to kick Halley into the stand but he only got sin binned for that one didn't he

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:04 pm  

Did Westwood not get sent off when he played for Wakefield after his notorious punch up with Kohe Love at Belle Vue?

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:07 pm  

Was he sent off for using his head as Gray Viane's punch bag in 2006?