: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:39 pm
I think paying out McRae should be the absolute last resort. If he had less than 6 months to run on his contract OK but at two and a half years you would be talking about paying out a lot of money the club simply can’t afford. This additional expense could hinder the amount we could offer the next coach, meaning we end up with what we can afford rather than who we want next time.
I can appreciate the arguments about lost revenue but why go to the expense of replacing the whole tyre before you have even attempted to repair the puncture?
My view is that the club should advertise for a new assistant coach, someone young, ambitious, who will bring new ideas and experience from playing at a high level in Superleague. And why not go a stage further with the recruitment process and involve both the Captain and Vice-Captain in the selection/interview process.
I would imagine that we could attract someone on a modest salary with the promise of bonuses relative to team performance and with a view to getting the coaches job on a permanent basis in the future.
The club is probably crying out for an assistant that would gain the respect of the players, motivate and instill new confidence and belief into the team. You usually find that new blood generally brings enthusiasm and this is something that clearly seems lacking at this moment.
Simms, Naylor and Hunte have been at the club for years and maybe things need freshening up!