Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 9:40 am  

DirkDiggler wrote:

Obviously if it's a centre it's either or both Sau and Griffin as their both only contracted for this season, aren't they?

Junior Sau signed a contract until the end of the 2017 season last year.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 10:00 am  

Also whoever said his first try was a walk-in is taking the p*ss. It still took a lot of scoring, but he skittled three defenders out of the way.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 11:43 am  

John Gilbert Reds wrote:

Also whoever said his first try was a walk-in is taking the p*ss. It still took a lot of scoring, but he skittled three defenders out of the way.

I agree he had 3 to 4 defenders on him, I was amazed he touched it down

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 11:53 am  

Let's remember that several Aussie players have taken a season to settle to the European game without the added challenge of a long injury.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 1:58 pm  

John Gilbert Reds wrote: Also whoever said his first try was a walk-in is taking the p*ss. It still took a lot of scoring, but he skittled three defenders out of the way. Redgunner Wrote. I agree he had 3 to 4 defenders on him, I was amazed he touched it down Gee Whiz, Vidot's first try gets more exaggerated by the post. There were three defenders on the back foot to which Vidot took the route in between them all.he didn't skittle them at all. He took four strides then dived to score, Junior Langi would have scored, it was a walk in. Clicky

John Gilbert Reds wrote: Also whoever said his first try was a walk-in is taking the p*ss. It still took a lot of scoring, but he skittled three defenders out of the way. Redgunner Wrote. I agree he had 3 to 4 defenders on him, I was amazed he touched it down Gee Whiz, Vidot's first try gets more exaggerated by the post. There were three defenders on the back foot to which Vidot took the route in between them all.he didn't skittle them at all. He took four strides then dived to score, Junior Langi would have scored, it was a walk in. Clicky

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 2:39 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Gee Whiz, Vidot's first try gets more exaggerated by the post. There were three defenders on the back foot to which Vidot took the route in between them all.he didn't skittle them at all. He took four strides then dived to score, Junior Langi would have scored, it was a walk in. Clicky The try took some scoring,many players would not have managed it,it followed a good pattern of play which put the defenders in a position that Vidot took advantage of. Are you related to Lance Todd by any chance?

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Gee Whiz, Vidot's first try gets more exaggerated by the post. There were three defenders on the back foot to which Vidot took the route in between them all.he didn't skittle them at all. He took four strides then dived to score, Junior Langi would have scored, it was a walk in. Clicky The try took some scoring,many players would not have managed it,it followed a good pattern of play which put the defenders in a position that Vidot took advantage of. Are you related to Lance Todd by any chance?

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 3:34 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Gee Whiz, Vidot's first try gets more exaggerated by the post. There were three defenders on the back foot to which Vidot took the route in between them all.he didn't skittle them at all. He took four strides then dived to score, Junior Langi would have scored, it was a walk in.

I realize all you want to do is antagonize

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 3:48 pm  

Stan's never been wrong. Ever.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 3:50 pm  

Original Salford City Red wrote:

The try took some scoring,many players would not have managed it,it followed a good pattern of play which put the defenders in a position that Vidot took advantage of.

Are you related to Lance Todd by any chance?

Redgunner Wrote:
I realize all you want to do is antagonize

Can tell you Two never played the game.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 23, 2016 3:54 pm  

TheButcher wrote:

Stan's never been wrong. Ever.

Cheers matey,