Re: Wakefield - Post Match : Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:23 pm  

redgunner wrote:

I understand supporters frustrations at both the Catalans & Wakefield results but have you, we should have had at least a point at Wigan & should have beaten Warrington on the day.

Gunner, the Warrington game we turned up for forty minutes, the same against Widnes but we held on just. So the St Helens, Warrington, Wigan, Widnes, and Castleford games were justifiable performances, however, Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield were embarrassingly not. Getting beaten I can swallow, but winning and losing in an unethical manner to Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield I struggle to swallow. Players attitudes and desire should never come into question. They're Non-negotiables at most clubs, yet condoned here.

Re: Wakefield - Post Match : Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:42 pm  

RE. "winning and losing in an unethical manner".

Please explain. I cannot remember us beating or losing to a team by underhand methods (this season - before Hudd fans come on about cannonball tackles ). Also I read the various comments as reasons not excuses. The joy with watching any sport is that you cannot predict. So do not expect perfection.

Re: Wakefield - Post Match : Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:34 pm  

Hillbilly_Red wrote:

RE. "winning and losing in an unethical manner".

Please explain. I cannot remember us beating or losing to a team by underhand methods (this season - before Hudd fans come on about cannonball tackles ). Also I read the various comments as reasons not excuses. The joy with watching any sport is that you cannot predict. So do not expect perfection.

Quite simple really,Why you so serious. The following performances, Hull, Hull KR, Catalans, Huddersfield, and Wakefield have lacked moral values attributed in Rugby League terms, making the performances lacking in morality in Rugby League terms not in true life form.

With regards to expecting perfection, that is simply not the case, unlike you, I expect all the moral values to be met where attitude, aptitude, and desire are NOT left wanting collectively which are immoral in Rugby League terms, get with the times HillBilly Red we're not in the 70's anymore where a Woodbine and a pint was the half-time refreshments. Urine and chips come to mind.

Re: Wakefield - Post Match : Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:13 pm  

I am confused by your answer. To me ethics refer to two possibilties:
1 that county where young things are noted for hair lacqer and fake tans
2 how morality is practised: I dare you to state to the players that that they are immoral.

As for the distinction between RL and "true life form" , , I must have drank too much before matches and believed that what I saw on the meadow was true to life. Oh well, at least now I can relax knowing it is all an illusion. Benthamite ethics at their best.