Re: Phil Clarke : Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:31 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

Maybe Wigan shouldn't sign crocked superstars , no doubt paying them a fortune in the process

Maybe Leigh should invest in an academy

Re: Phil Clarke : Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:19 am  

Willzay wrote:

Maybe Leigh should invest in an academy

We did , there was nobody to play against

So genuinely , why bother ?

Re: Phil Clarke : Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:39 am  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

incredible how your club went from second division fodder and only getting 3-4,000 at home in the first Div to where you were the no.1 club in such a few short years.
Shed ton of money makes a big difference doesn't it?

Of course money makes a difference. What on earth is your point? Do you want us to apologise for having money and an ambition to be a big club?

Re: Phil Clarke : Sat Jun 10, 2017 11:42 am  

Why does everything on here end up with silly name calling? I wonder if everybody would speak to each other in the same manner face to face? Im a Leigh fan and some of ours on here don't half make a fool of themselves.

A win is a Win, Wigan have the best back line in the league IMO the difference between them & Castelford is the forwards.

Let us have our moment and if we manage to stay in SL it will give us chance to grow and underpin the club.

We have come a long way in 4 years.

Re: Phil Clarke : Sat Jun 10, 2017 1:36 pm  

Willzay wrote:

Regarding SKY can Hemmings and the rest please go one game without putting "missing players" and "Wigan" in the same sentence.

You missed out Sam Tomkins.

Re: Phil Clarke : Sun Jun 11, 2017 5:44 am  

Binosh wrote:

Why does everything on here end up with silly name calling? I wonder if everybody would speak to each other in the same manner face to face? Im a Leigh fan and some of ours on here don't half make a fool of themselves.

A win is a Win, Wigan have the best back line in the league IMO the difference between them & Castelford is the forwards.

Let us have our moment and if we manage to stay in SL it will give us chance to grow and underpin the club.

We have come a long way in 4 years.

well said. I for one have enjoyed having leigh in SL this season.

Re: Phil Clarke : Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:23 am  

Ste100Centurions wrote:

Massively as in approximately 10 from a squad of 40 or massively as in 10 from a squad of 28 as Leigh were ?

Get a grip sunshine !

Sorry, I'll rephrase, you beat a full strength Wigan side (less 10 first team players) playing on top of their game (lost the last 6) and it is bigger than if you' won the challenge cup.

Bottom line is that result will change very little, you'll still be bottom 2 come the end of the year

Re: Phil Clarke : Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:20 pm  

barham red wrote:

Sorry, I'll rephrase, you beat a full strength Wigan side (less 10 first team players) playing on top of their game (lost the last 6) and it is bigger than if you' won the challenge cup.

Bottom line is that result will change very little, you'll still be bottom 2 come the end of the year

i have a question,when and where has derek said beating wigan is bigger than winning the challenge cup.