[Bullseye]

Well it was from what I saw.

Bullseye wrote:

Well it was from what I saw.

the amount of laying on Swinton we’re doing and to be honest poor errors on our part

Having taken time time to read and digest the state of the comments on here and across social media, im left with 2 main questions.

1. Did the people commenting actually watch the game.

2. Do people realise its a pre season game having not played for 12 months.

Some off the stuff ive read is nothing short of embarrassing. So called fans have no f***ing idea.

Decent run out for a friendly and an entertaining game. Flanagan is still a very important member of this team. His go forward from hb is first class. Mick mentioned a middle player from a superleague team coming to us. My guess is its Adam Tangata.

RagingBull wrote:

Having taken time time to read and digest the state of the comments on here and across social media, im left with 2 main questions.

1. Did the people commenting actually watch the game.

2. Do people realise its a pre season game having not played for 12 months.

Some off the stuff ive read is nothing short of embarrassing. So called fans have no f***ing idea.

My personal favourite was a comment on the FB 'Banter' group where some drip said that next weeks game was a "must win".

dddooommm wrote:

My personal favourite was a comment on the FB 'Banter' group where some drip said that next weeks game was a "must win".

No preseason game is a must win it’s just a win would be good for momentum coming into the competitive season then again a win at Featherstone is far from assured

Stockwell & Smales wrote:

Decent run out for a friendly and an entertaining game. Flanagan is still a very important member of this team. His go forward from hb is first class. Mick mentioned a middle player from a superleague team coming to us. My guess is its Adam Tangata.

Nope

[Bullseye]

I was impressed with Flanagan too. He made an impact in both stints and looked fit.

I thought we looked OK given the lay off. Obviously the halfback pairing is new and needs to bed in. There's also a few pounds that neeed shedding on some of the middle forwards.

I've no idea who the middle forward is that Mick referred to but we could do with an extra body there. That said I thought Fleming did well.

Bullseye wrote:

I was impressed with Flanagan too. He made an impact in both stints and looked fit.

I thought we looked OK given the lay off. Obviously the halfback pairing is new and needs to bed in. There's also a few pounds that neeed shedding on some of the middle forwards.

I've no idea who the middle forward is that Mick referred to but we could do with an extra body there. That said I thought Fleming did well.

Out of interest which middle forward do you think are a touch more sizeable