Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:56 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Someone's pulling Mick's strings obviously. How else would he know what the administrator is or isn't doing.

Anyway. That pint is definitely yours Frank if your ship comes in

This. Think micks left himself wide open to legal action this time. Can't use his normal trick of deleting tweets as they've been screenshoted pretty widely.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:01 pm  

mat wrote:

This. Think micks left himself wide open to legal action this time. Can't use his normal trick of deleting tweets uas they've been screenshoted pretty widely.

Legal action for what?

The Marc Green influeneced bid wants property control , RFL will not give it. Administrator has ignored all bidders bar his preferred option involving Marc Green.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:04 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

He doesn't. It wasn't long ago he told us all the administrator was on his jollies. Something that nobody else reported (except as rumour, coming no doubt from Billy) and that same administrator put out statements while he was supposedly on a beach.

He'll get a stupid little snippet of something and expand that to something grandiose. Something like Richard Lamb sent a Christmas card to Gary Pettit, who didn't send one back. That immediately means the administrator is ignoring Lamb's bid for the club.
Either that or someone is bull$hitting him and he lacks the intelligence to realise, so reports it as fact to all the naive people who will pay attention.

I despair that anyone still listens to the total clown. I hope that the administrator sues him once this is all over for defamation. It might encourage him to STFU.

There's enough deformation of character here for me to take legal action against you.

You're obviously someone from the pro Marc Green camp Chris.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:06 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

There's enough deformation of character here for me to take legal action against you.

You're obviously someone from the pro Marc Green camp Chris.

If you sue everyone who calls you a bull$hitter, you may as well set up camp in the courtroom. You are causing a lot of worried Bulls fans grief. You may think you're helping, but in reality, you're making it worse. It's disgraceful.

Where did Mr. Pettit go on holiday btw?

And WTF is Chris?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:07 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

Legal action for what?

The Marc Green influeneced bid wants property control , RFL will not give it. Administrator has ignored all bidders bar his preferred option involving Marc Green.

Defamation of administrator for a start.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:09 pm  

So we are led to believe that the options are

1. Mick's posting that Marc Green is the one remaining bid, rebuffed by the RFL. This will surely lead to liquidation

2. Frank's repeated assurances that a credible unnamed bidder has everything in hand once the RFL agree everything

Not a lot of overlap there is there?

I guess time will tell which of them is right

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:10 pm  

I don't care what Mick posts. The Internet is full of fantasists.

I just wish that people wouldn't believe him.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:11 pm  

mat wrote:

Defamation of administrator for a start.

Correct. Micks basically said the administrator is acting illegally for a start.

[Bullseye]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:11 pm  

Ok. Ok. Let's try and keep calm. I'm off to bed so try not to defame or sue anyone while I'm asleep.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:13 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Ok. Ok. Let's try and keep calm. I'm off to bed so try not to defame or sue anyone while I'm asleep.

Can we deform them like Mick's accused somebody of doing to him.