Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:39 pm  

Still doesnt make up for the 3 forwards passes he called against us and the 3 that he didn't call against hull that led to 2 tries and 1 near try.

It's the Steve Ganson show.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:40 pm  

Jes never heard clark and Carney so baised before.

They just did not want anything to go for Saints. Every call they were against Saints. There was no way Foster knocked the ball forwards he had it in his hand till the hull player dragged it out and they were calling for a knock on. Then Nathan ash gets taken out in the air.

If that had been carney we would have seen 6 forward rolls and a cartwheel to emphasis the point, but as it's a saints lad, oh no he was going for the ball.

Awesome once again from the lads. They really showed their metal. Joint top with that team. Just wait till we get ourselves a few players back.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:42 pm  

No way a penalty, can't challenge for a high ball now?

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:44 pm  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

Give over. Washbrook cleary is going for the ball, hence him not taking his eyes of it and him jumping in the air with his hands up.

You probably deserved a point in the end anyway. But to say it was the correct decision is very foolish.

Balls, you just wanted Hull to win. For a challenge in the air to not be penalised you have to challenge for the ball. He's nowhere near it.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:45 pm  

It's a 50-50 call, but Washbrook isn't helped by the little nudge Roby gives him. If he doesn't get a nudge, he gets closer to the ball.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:45 pm  

I will try and not talk about Ganson.

But instead focus on what was a fantastic game of rugby, two teams that went for it and really wanted to win and play rugby.

A amazing kicking game in the 20 minute spell after halftime and massive games from Wilkin and Roby.

seemed a great atmosphere.

Good luck with the rest of the season.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:46 pm  

so many flamers coming on and raging ffs the decisions levelled themselves out and a draw was a fair reflection of the game

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:46 pm  

Look at it again, ball came off washbrook and went forward to houghton who was off side anyway. Regardless of washbrooks challenge, it was a penalty in any event.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:48 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Balls, you just wanted Hull to win. For a challenge in the air to not be penalised you have to challenge for the ball. He's nowhere near it.

Apart from being directly under it? You're saying a playing can jump up like that flail about aimlessly miss it and because someone touches him its a penalty? Washbrook only made contact after the ball was through the Saints players hands.

Its a joke.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 3:49 pm  

The Chief wrote:

Look at it again, ball came off washbrook and went forward to houghton who was off side anyway. Regardless of washbrooks challenge, it was a penalty in any event.

Exactly. He impacts Ashe in the air in the legs and it's his hands striking at the ball that knock it forward. Either way it's 24 all.