Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:59 am  

rally2001 wrote:

How do you know what hes on? Have you got any evidence to back your view?

I do honestly think there are other reasons he's going.

Yeah more money, from endorsements, personal sponsorship etc that you get from a sport with a bigger international presence.

He's gone for the money and it's difficult to blame him for that aspect as it's a job to him and most of us would switch jobs if we were offered more cash upfront and better prospects...

I do however blame Kyle for his total lapse(s) in judgment earlier in the year (going on TV to talk like he did shows a lack of maturity and respect) and terrible performances on the field probably caused by a complete lack of focus.

The club can be blamed for not doing something earlier contract wise (if he refused to sign we could have sold him potentially like the do in football when a players contract is winding down) but the way the actual move has been handled is 100% all Eastmond's fault and nothing to do with the club

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:40 pm  

Just saw the SLTV report from the game and Kyle looked like he was giving an all-action performance. You could also see him celebrating and enjoying himself.

C'mon Kyle, take this chance at full back and turn your (our the team's) season round. You've been with us since you were 14, let's make sure you leave with some good memories and wash away all the poop from earlier this year.

You've got my full backing, kid.

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:58 pm  

I genuinely think he could be a revelation at full back for the remainder of the season. We need pace and zip in that position and his support play is outstanding. Him, Lomax and Pryce lining up together (fully fit obviously) at 1,6, and 7 is frightening for any team to face and would give us a good shot at competing.

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:47 pm  

He has got great potential at fullback with his explosive pace and the extra space he'll get would really benefit us in attack but I'm not sure how he'd handle the high ball and cope in defence.

Let's not hype him up as a top class fullback yet, he was only playing Wakefield.

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:46 pm  

Kyle has always been a good attacker, its his defence that has been suspect, and he had no defence to do yesterday. Against Wigan/wire/hudds i fear he'd get smashed out of the way or simply run over

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:05 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Lee Smith is (actually, was) a good player - but Kyle Eastmond he ain't.

he didn't look like a good player last night when Freddie Vaccari made him look foolish.

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:09 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

Against Wigan/wire/hudds i fear he'd get smashed out of the way or simply run over

This is my fear too with Kyle, although not just him (our whole backline if Wello isn't there). I'd add the Dragons to your list as well because they are a big set of blokes. But not only that, they have Blanch, who seems to be running red hot at the moment and able to score tries that a human being shouldn't be able to score and Menzies who seems to run teams ragged when really he should be drawing his pension.

I don't have much hope of a win at all on friday night tbh. In fact, I have no hope!

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:06 pm  

If Dureau (sp) doesn't play I think Saints will win, he is the catalyst for them.

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:25 am  

he will be a big loss for you and it all shows how you replace him and what you do from then. but in the long run can see him coming back to league one day as don't think he will suit union.

no one can blame the lad for going to union it's a major payt rise for him think him staying at saints would be like any person outside of sport turning down a promotion it ain't gonna happen.

where do you think lance hohoiho(sp) whatever his name is, is going to play for you (halves or fullback)?

Re: Kyle Eastmond : Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:08 pm  

Is there any clause that has been written into his contract with Bath, that Saints get first refusal should a return to League occurs?